Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme : February 9, 2012





Regular Sections

- Weekly CPU Prices
- Weekly Memory Prices
- PC Buyer's Guides
- Private Eye
- Forums Spotlight
- The Rear View
- The Silicon Money Pit
- SharkyForums
- Site Info
- Links
- About Us

The biggest way Intel is reducing the cost of their core logic sets for system integrators is through the inclusion of their older i740 graphics accelerator chip into the 810 itself. Since the i740 was designed from the beginning to operated using a system's main DRAM for both Frame Buffer and Texture Cache responsibilities, the inclusion of it in the 810 makes perfect sense at the low end of the market.

Although raw video performance isn't blistering by any means by the 810's integrated i740 (in fact it's downright laughable to the hardcore gamer) the price target of mainboards based on the 810 is enough to offset the performance gaps to buyers not interested in gaming beyond 35fps.

Here are some benchmarks regurgitated from Intel's documentation of the 810, performed on a Celeron 466-powered system:

Benchmark

32MB Standard

32MB DC100

64MB Standard

64 MB DC100

99 WinBench 2D

139

140

138

140

99 WinBench 3D

--2

--2

300

384

Winstone

14.4

15.5

20.6

21

3Dmark99

--2

--2

1165

1356

Final Reality

4.08

4.107

4.131

4.14

Forsaken 1024 x 7681

33.5

37.65

32.9

37.72

Forsaken 800 x 6001

42.85

57.3

43.06

57.4

Quake II 1024 x 7681

N/A3

14.1

15.7

19.7

Quake II 800 x 6001

9.4

23.6

24.3

28.5

Quake II 640 x 4801

19.6

30.9

31.3

36.7

Unreal 1024 x 7681

8.75

19.8

17

19.8

Unreal 800 x 6001

12.51

14.6

27.84

31.56

1 Number pairs denote screen resolution during test.
2 Test requires 64MB of System Memory to run.
3 Quake II recommends 24MB of System Memory for this resolution.






Copyright © 2001 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy