Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme :


Latest News


- NZXT Unleashes the Sentry LX High-Performance Fan Controller
- OCZ Announces the Core Series of SATA II Solid State Drives
- Asetek Introduces the First Liquid-Cooling System for the Radeon HD 4870
- AMD Exhumes the All-in-Wonder Brand Name
- AMD Hits a New Performance High with the ATI Radeon HD 4800
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- May Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- March Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- January High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE & 9350e Review
    - AMD Phenom X3 8750 Review

  • Motherboards

    - AMD 780G Chipset Review

  • Video Cards

    - PNY XLR8 GeForce 9800 GX2 1GB Review
    - Gigabyte Radeon HD 3870 512MB Review
    - ASUS EN8800GT TOP 512MB Review





  • Benchmark Preface

    Before going knee-deep into the benchmarks, it is well worth making the point that this Iwill board is not a final rev and Iwill has made it known to us that the performance at this point is not quite 'final' either. With that in mind, we at SE don't usually go out full guns blazing in previews a la' Mel Gibson with his Hollywood assault on all things Britain (it's not my fault he didn't know what to do without "freedooooom").

    Therefore this is more of a 'preview' look and a follow-up to the last piece we did. As far as stability was concerned, we will also reserve judgement once we get our serrated teeth on a retail board. But just as an FYI we did encounter a few hiccups, which you can see in Ben's "Lab Notes" section. Bear in mind that this product is still under development and that these types of problems are not at all unusual at this level of development. The scores shown here are only an early representation of what will come. We'll be looking to Iwill to correct these issues as development continues.

    As computer processor speeds continue to climb like Sherpas, it's just a matter of time until your computer struggles to keep the processor supplied with data and instructions. Unless, of course, the system memory bandwidth increases appropriately. Raw bandwidth is where we expect the DDR memory interface to excel, and SiSoft Sandra is just the tool to measure this performance. Using a combination of calculations, Sandra reports an average for both the CPU and the FPU. Between the increased front side bus speed and the DDR RAM, there should be some impressive bandwidth increases.

    The first thing you'll notice is that we're using Sandra 2001 and not 2000. The second thing you'll see is that AMD's Corona system really performs here, with bandwidth numbers higher than we've ever seen before. The CPU score of 567MB/s is 17% above the 1.2GHz system equipped with normal SDRAM. And almost at the same level (at 562MB/s) is the ALi MAGiK 1 DDR chipset. It's not only a good sign to see ALI keeping up with AMD's Corona here but once again you can see the advantage that DDR Ram has over age-old SDR, which the KT-133 system used coming in last.

    Even more impressive though is the FPU bandwidth score of 768MB/s – roughly 40% more than the 1.2GHz system paired with a KT133 motherboard. It's the same story in Windows 2000, with the ALI and VIA DDR chipsets both steaming ahead of the KT-133 SDRAM based system. Now that we've seen theoretical numbers, let's take a look at something a bit more tangible.





    Copyright © 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. About INT Media Group | Press Releases | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities