Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme :


Latest News


- Crucial Triples Up With New Three-Channel DDR3 Kits
- OCZ Adds Three New Fatal1ty Power Supplies
- BFG Offers Free AGP to PCI Express Upgrade
- Kanguru's e-Flash Makes the Jump to USB and eSATA
- Gateway Launches New Core i7-powered FX-Series Gaming PCs
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- July High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - Intel Core i7-965 XE & Core i7-920 Review

  • Motherboards

    - Intel DX48BT2 (X48) Motherboard Review
    - AMD 790GX Chipset Review
    - Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DS5 Motherboard Review
    - AMD 780G Chipset Review

  • Video Cards





  • The old method of mip-mapping was done on a per-polygon level. The same mip-map would be used for an entire polygon, even when some pixels of that polygon were better suited to a different mip-map. Gone is the per polygon mip-mapping of the TNT2, in favor of per pixel mip-mapping. Per-pixel mip-mapping, as the name suggests, can calculate which mip-map to use on a per-pixel basis, which yields more accurate mip-mapping.

    By color-coding different mip-map levels, per polygon mip-mapping and per pixel mip-mapping can be easily differentiated. Shown below are two screen captures from Quake III Arena Test with color coded mip-map levels taken from Kert's GeForce 256 In-Depth article.

    TNT2: per polygon mip-mapping (above)
    GeForce: per pixel mip-mapping (below)





    Copyright © 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. About INT Media Group | Press Releases | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities