Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles January 28, 2010





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- IBM, Fujifilm Set Tape Storage Density Record
- ATI Debuts DirectX 11 Graphics Card for $99
- Super Talent Offers Shirt-Pocket Flash RAID Array
- Intel's New Atoms Borrow from Nehalem
- Intel Unveils First Integrated CPU Lineup
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards


  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers



  •   


    Intel Pentium 4-2.53 and 2.4B GHz Review
    By Vince Freeman :  May 6, 2002

    PCMark 2002 Pro Performance

    PCMark 2002 Pro is an intriguing system benchmark, as it relates more to basic computer usage. Instead of relying on synthetic scores or actual business applications, it cuts a swath between the two methodologies. PCMark 2002 Pro performs CPU tasks such as image compression, text search and audio conversion, while combining this with a selection of similar benchmarks for memory, hard drive and video components. As we are dealing specifically with processors, the two portions we will be looking at are the CPU and Memory Scores.

    In the CPU tests, the Pentium 4 has exhibited noticeable advantages in previous comparisons, and at 2.53 GHz, this one is not even close. Where we see a surprising result is in the i850E vs. SiS 645DX comparison, where the SiS chipset takes the overall crown. PCMark 2002 is a bit different CPU test than found in SiSoft and based on previous benchmark reviews, it does take into consideration the performance of the subsystem.

    The way PCMark 2002 Pro actually performs the memory tests is different than other benchmarks (such as SiSoft SANDRA), as it tests the system using a wide array of data sets, and of varying sizes. This tends to give the Pentium 4 an advantage, since at the lower-size data levels, both AMD and Intel platforms perform closely, but at a few of the tests using very large data sizes, the Pentium 4 takes a noticeable lead. Once again we see the SiS 645DX taking the performance lead, and solidifying for AMD owners that previous results were not simply a RDRAM/DDR discrepancy.



    Page 1 Introduction
    Page 2 The Pentium 4-2.53 and 2.4B GHz
    Page 3 The Intel 850E
    Page 4 Performance and Test Systems
    Page 5 Business and Content Creation Winstone Performance
    Page 6 SANDRA 2002 and SYSmark 2002 Performance
  • Page 7 PCMark 2002 Pro Performance
    Page 8 3DMark 2001SE Pro and Quake 3: Arena Performance
    Page 9 Serious Sam & Return to Castle Wolfenstein Performance
    Page 10 Comanche 4 and Jedi Knight II Performance
    Page 11 Benchmark Analysis and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2010 QuinStreet Inc. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers