Compare prices
and save on:
Compare Prices:









CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices

Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles November 13, 2005

 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links

 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking

Latest News

- New VIA Chipset Optimized for Dual-Card Graphics
- AMD Turion 64 Powers Averatec's 5-Pound Portable
- ATI Intros Fastest, Fanciest All-in-Wonder Card To Date
- New WinBook Desktop-Replacement Laptops Start at $500
- WinBook Introduces Affordable 15.4-Inch Widescreen Notebooks
News Archives


- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review
- Unreal Tournament 2004 Review
- Disney's ToonTown Online Review
- The Simpsons: Hit and Run Review

Buyer's Guides

- October Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide


  • CPUs

    - Athlon 64 X2 4600+ and 4200+ Review

  • Motherboards

    - DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards

    Be a Commerce Partner
    Web Programming
    Domain registration
    Digital Cameras
    Online Degrees
    New Car Prices
    Best Digital Camera
    Batteries & Chargers
    Web Design
    IT Discount Club
    Internet Lists
    Internet News
    Internet Resources
    Linux/Open Source
    Personal Technology
    Small Business
    Windows Technology
    xSP Resources
    Corporate Info
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers

    Compare products, prices, and stores at Hardware Central!


    AMD Athlon XP 2700+ Review
    By Vince Freeman :  October 1, 2002

    SiSoft SANDRA 2002 SP1 Performance

    SiSoft SANDRA 2002 is an interesting suite of individual benchmarks and system utilities. The CPU benchmarks are artificial tests that can give a different view of processor and subsystem performance, far away from application-based testing. The benchmarks that truly isolate processor performance are the CPU Arithmetic and Multi-Media tests. Please note that in all CPU testing, there was no change in the default activation of all MMX, SSE and SSE2 enhancements.

    The first stop on the SiSoft SANDRA train is for the CPU Arithmetic tests. These highlight the theoretical performance of the ALU (integer) and FPU (floating-point) portions of each CPU. In our SANDRA ALU testing, the Athlon XP 2700+ pushes AMD out to an even larger lead, and comes within a hair of topping the 6000 mark. The FPU scores place the Intel Pentium 4 back on top, but note that this includes SSE2 enhancements in the total score.

    The CPU Multi-Media benchmarks are split in the exact same way, with the Athlon XP 2700+ taking the ALU section, while the Pentium 4-2.8 GHz wins in the FPU area. The big difference is that AMD closes the gap quite substantially when multimedia extensions are brought into the FPU equation, and loses out to the Pentium 4-2.8 GHz by the smallest of margins.

    The SiSoft SANDRA memory bandwidth tests are the most popular section of the benchmark suite, and give us an excellent opportunity to examine the potential benefits of an AMD 333 MHz front-side bus. The differences here are quite startling, especially when comparing the 266 MHz Athlon XP 2600+ to the new 333 MHz Athlon XP 2700+. AMD still falls a bit behind the SiS 645DX/Pentium 4 combination, but the Intel DDR lead has shrunk considerably. As usual, RDRAM holds court in overall bandwidth, even when comparing basic PC800 to DDR333.

    PCMark 2002 Pro Performance

    PCMark 2002 Pro is an intriguing system benchmark, as it relates more to a more generic computer application usage pattern. Instead of relying on synthetic scores or actual business applications, it cuts a swath between the two methodologies. PCMark 2002 Pro performs CPU tasks such as image compression, text search and audio conversion, while combining this with a selection of similar benchmarks for memory, hard drive and video components. As we are dealing specifically with processors, the two portions we tested are the CPU and Memory benchmarks.

    In the PCMark Pro 2002 CPU test, the Athlon XP 2700+ increases performance levels above that of previous Athlon XP models, yet still falls back of the Pentium 4-2.8 GHz. The actual performance jump is a combination of the slightly higher core speed and the 333 MHz FSB, and help the Athlon XP 2700+ achieve a higher score than older Athlon XP processors.

    The PCMark 2002 Memory test is a slightly different story, and shows less of a performance gain than SiSoft SANDRA. The Athlon XP 2700+ does demonstrate a performance jump compared to the Athlon XP 2600+, but still loses out big to the Pentium 4. Some of this discrepancy is due to the differences in CPU design, as the 512K L2 cache of the Pentium 4 lends itself better to some of the large data-set tests found in PCMark 2002.


    AMD Athlon XP 2700 Review Products
    Shop here to Save Money on Processors at DealTime! Search by brand or type to find the best price across 100s of stores!

    Shop by Top Models:

    Page 1Introduction
    Page 2Performance and Test Systems
    Page 3Business and Content Creation Winstone Performance
  • Page 4SANDRA 2002 and PCMark 2002 Performance
    Page 53DMark 2001SE, Quake 3 & Serious Sam 2 Performance
    Page 6Jedi Knight II, Comanche 4 and RtCW Performance
    Page 7Unreal Tournament Performance & Benchmark Analysis
    Page 8Value and Conclusion

    Copyright(c) 2005 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy
    Check Out These Featured Resources from the CommVault Unified Data Management Center
    No SAN is an Island
    D2D2T Options for Information Life Cycle Management
    Information Lifecycle Management with CommVault QiNetix
    CommVault Galaxy Backup and Recovery