logo
wwwsharky
quicksearch


start menu
Home
Forum
PC Buyers
CPU Prices
RAM Prices
Compare Prices
About Us
spacer
bend
Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles February 5, 2012
bend
spacer
Get the latest reviews and tutorials!
Register for the free
Hardware Daily Newsletter!




 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



RSS feed










CPU Reviews & Articles

spacer  

AMD Athlon XP 3200+ Barton Review

By Vince Freeman :  May 13, 2003

Serious Sam: The Second Encounter Performance

Serious Sam: The Second Encounter is a great sequel in the popular franchise and the benchmark portion is even better than the original. This new game not only puts the pressure on processors and 3D cards (especially at higher resolutions) but provides some excellent in-game demos in wide open spaces with tons of enemies. For our specific tests, we have used the in-game Elephant Atrium demo to determine potential framerates, at 1024x768x32-bit.

Serious Sam 2 is a benchmark that is far more concerned with raw power than most other tests, and AMD processors have always performed well in it. This time is no exception, as the Athlon XP 3200+ finishes well in front and takes back the crown lost to the Pentium 4-3.0C.

Return to Castle Wolfenstein Performance

Return to Castle Wolfenstein is another Quake-based game, but with some notable differences. The basic game engine may be the same, but the graphics, gameplay and stress it puts on a processor are very different. Until the next Quake game appears, RtCW is the next best way to determine high-end Quake engine performance. We have used the Checkpoint MP demo using the default High Quality detail settings and have upped the resolution to 1024x768.

The Return to Castle Wolfenstein benchmark scores keep to the standard trend, and show the Athlon XP 3200+ finishing ahead of the Pentium 4-3.06 GHz, but still falling back from the Pentium 4-3.0C. This test also shows a nice framerate jump from the Athlon XP 3000+ to the 3200+.

Comanche 4 Benchmark

The Comanche 4 benchmark from Novalogic gives us an opportunity to use an actual flight sim for performance testing. Flight sims are notorious for their CPU-dependence, and this makes the Comanche 4 benchmark potentially a better CPU test than it is for 3D video cards. The reliance on the CPU shows itself off in the benchmark, and even the slightest difference in framerates could pay off in significantly enhanced game framerates. For our processor comparison, all testing has been performed at 1024x768, 32-bit with audio disabled.

The Athlon XP 3200+ doesn't fare quite as well in Comanche 4 benchmarking, and it seems that this test doesn't really benefit too much from a faster FSB or higher-clocked memory. This is in evidence not only through the lower-than Pentium 4 scores, but also because the Athlon XP 3200+ shows only a nominal framerate gain over the Athlon XP 3000+.


Page 1

Introduction

Page 2

The Athlon XP 3200+ Processor

Page 3

Performance and Test Systems

Page 4

Business and Content Creation Winstone Performance

Page 5

PCMark 2002 and 3DMark 2001SE Pro Performance

Page 6

3DMark 2003 and Quake 3 Performance

  • Page 7

    Serious Sam 2, RtCW and Comanche 4 Performance

    Page 8

    Jedi Knight II and Unreal Tournament 2003 Performance

    Page 9

    Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion