Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles February 1, 2010





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- Microsoft Gaming Keyboard Has Awesome Anti-Ghosting
- Matrox Lets Multi-Monitor Fans Double Up
- IBM, Fujifilm Set Tape Storage Density Record
- ATI Debuts DirectX 11 Graphics Card for $99
- Super Talent Offers Shirt-Pocket Flash RAID Array
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards


  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers



  •   


    Intel Pentium 4-3.2 GHz Review
    By Vince Freeman :  June 24, 2003

    PCMark 2002 Pro Performance

    PCMark 2002 Pro is an intriguing system benchmark, as it relates more to a more generic computer application usage pattern. Instead of relying on synthetic scores or actual business applications, it cuts a swath between the two methodologies. PCMark 2002 Pro performs CPU tasks such as image compression, text search and audio conversion, while combining this with a selection of similar benchmarks for memory, hard drive and video components. As we are dealing specifically with processors, the two sections we test are the CPU and Memory benchmarks.

    The PCMark Pro 2002 CPU benchmarks really benefit from the higher clock speeds of the Pentium 4, so it's no surprise that the Pentium 4-3.2 GHz is the top dog. Once again the i865PE platform doesn't fall too far back from the i875P, and takes second place.

    The PCMark 2002 Memory scores demonstrate once again that the PAT feature on the i875P pays serious dividends. In fact, the i875P using the Pentium 4-3.2, 3.0C and 2.8C outdistance the i865PE using the 3.2 GHz Pentium 4. Where memory performance is concerned, the platform can have far more impact than the CPU or memory used.

    SiSoft SANDRA 2003 Performance

    SiSoft SANDRA 2003 is an interesting suite of individual benchmarks and system utilities. The memory bandwidth tests are the most popular section of the SiSoft SANDRA benchmark selection, and highlight the potential performance levels of the CPU-memory subsystem.

    The PCMark 2002 scores are duplicated in SiSoft SANDRA 2003 MMX memory testing, and once again the PAT-enabled i875P takes the top three spots, showing some impressive numbers, even with a Pentium 4-2.8C GHz in tow.

    The SiSoft SANDRA 2003 SSE benchmarks aren't much different than the MMX results, and it's once again the Pentium 4-3.2 GHz/i875P in the top spots, and the i865PE not being able to catch up, even using 3.2 GHz of Pentium 4 power.



    Page 1 Introduction
    Page 2 Performance and Test Systems
    Page 3 Business and Content Creation Winstone Performance
  • Page 4 PCMark 2002 and SiSoft SANDRA 2003 Performance
    Page 5 3DMark 2001SE, 3DMark 2003 and Quake 3 Performance
    Page 6 Serious Sam 2, RtCW and Comanche 4 Performance
    Page 7 Jedi Knight II and Unreal Tournament 2003 Performance
    Page 8 Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2010 QuinStreet Inc. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers