Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles November 16, 2005


 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- New WinBook Desktop-Replacement Laptops Start at $500
- WinBook Introduces Affordable 15.4-Inch Widescreen Notebooks
- Intel Adds Virtualization Technology To New Pentium 4s
- Speed Freaks: Nvidia Intros, BFG Overclocks GeForce 7800 GTX 512
- Fujitsu Slims Down Its Pentium M Ultraportable
News Archives

Features

- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review
- Unreal Tournament 2004 Review
- Disney's ToonTown Online Review
- The Simpsons: Hit and Run Review

Buyer's Guides

- October Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - Athlon 64 X2 4600+ and 4200+ Review

  • Motherboards

    - DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner
    PDA Reviews
    Add Video Ads
    Dedicated Servers
    Compare Prices
    Giveaways
    Web Hosting Services
    Hosting
    Digital Cameras
    Promotional Items
    Merchant Accounts

    internet.com
    Developer
    Downloads
    International
    Internet Lists
    Internet News
    Internet Resources
    IT
    Linux/Open Source
    Personal Technology
    Small Business
    Windows Technology
    xSP Resources
    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


  •   


    AMD Athlon 64 3400+ Processor Review
    By Vince Freeman :  January 6, 2004

    TMPGEnc Plus MPEG-1 Encoding Performance

    For the next test, we've taken the same high-end, 3-minute AVI file, and encoded it to MPEG-1 using TMPGEnc Plus 2.5. This is a bit less stressful on the system than our previous MPEG-2 encoding, but is very popular for VCD authoring. The performance results are expressed in the form of time elapsed (minutes: seconds) and as with the MPEG-2 results, a smaller bar denotes less time taken, and therefore higher performance.

    The Athlon 64 3400+ shows a bit more speed with MPEG-1 encoding, and now comes out of ahead of the Pentium 4-3.0 GHz HT processor. Even so, neither AMD64 CPU can match the TMPGEnc Plus time of the Pentium 4-3.2 GHz. Also keep in mind that these tests were performed with a 3-minute AVI file, so real-world differences could be extrapolated to a 2-hour AVI file encoded to MPEG-1 or -2, and the completion time discrepancy would be much larger, even with these high-end processors.

    SiSoft SANDRA 2004 Performance

    SiSoft SANDRA 2004 is the latest revision of this popular system benchmark, but sticks to its roots and supplies a wide range of individual benchmarks and system utilities. The memory bandwidth tests are the most popular section of the SiSoft SANDRA benchmark suite, and highlight the potential performance levels of the CPU-memory subsystem.

    The SANDRA Integer memory bandwidth scores might be a bit shocking, given the relatively low scores of the Athlon 64 3400+, but keep in mind that this platform features a single channel DDR controller. Even so, its integrated memory controller is still able to surpass the Athlon XP 3200+, while naturally falling behind the Pentium 4 and Athlon 64 FX-51 results.

    The SiSoft SANDRA 2004 Floating Point Bandwidth scores follow the same basic trend, with the Athlon 64 3400+ posting a very competitive score for its architecture, but falling back of the more high-end memory subsystems.


    Shopping

    AMD Athlon 64 3400 Processor Review Products
    Compare Products,Prices and Stores

    Shop by Category:


    Page 1Athlon 64 3400+: High End for the Mainstream
    Page 2Performance and Test Systems
    Page 3Business & CC Winstone 2004 and MPEG-2 Encoding
  • Page 4MPEG-2 Encoding & SiSoft SANDRA 2004 Performance
    Page 5PCMark Pro 2004 Performance
    Page 6Quake 3, Wolfenstein: ET, and Comanche 4 Performance
    Page 7Unreal Tournament 2003 & X2: Demo Performance
    Page 83DMark 2003, AquaMark 3 & GunMetal Performance
    Page 9Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion

    Copyright(c) 2005 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy