Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles August 6, 2007


 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- Sony DVD Burners Boast 20X Recording Speed
- AverMedia ExpressCard Lets Laptops Tune In
- Corsair Touts Energy-Saving Power Supplies
- Logitech Debuts New Gaming Mouse, Revised Keyboard
- Oysters Inspire New Acer Consumer Notebook Designs
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- July Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- June High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- May Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - Athlon X2 BE-2350 Processor Review

  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards

    - PNY GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB Review

    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner
    Promotional Items
    Domain registration
    Custom Products
    Internet Security
    Memory
    Dental Insurance
    Domain Registration
    Hurricane Shutters
    Online Meetings
    GPS
    Life Insurance
    KVM Switches
    Mortgage Refinance
    KVM Switch over IP

    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology
    International

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


  •   


    AMD Athlon 64 3400+ Processor Review
    By Vince Freeman :  January 6, 2004

    Unreal Tournament 2003 Performance

    Unreal Tournament 2003 includes a benchmark program that automatically tests in two separate modes. One is Flyby, which takes a canned tour of the UT game world and then offers up a framerate score and really hammers both the CPU and video card. The second is Botmatch, and this is a more game-oriented test than Flyby, and is a far more CPU-bound test. In this section, weve tested UT 2003 at 1024x768 x 32-bit.

    The Athlon 64 FX-51 proved to be a super performer in Unreal Tournament 2003, and the Athlon 64 3400+ follows right in its footsteps. The Flyby scores are definitely weighted in the AMD64 court, and not only does the Athlon 64 3400+ roundly spank the Pentium 4 competition, it also gives the Athlon 64 FX-51 a run for the money, but falls just shy of that goal. To be exact, the Athlon 64 3400+ is just 0.5 FPS behind the FX-51 powerhouse, which is quite negligible in terms of overall performance.

    The UT 2003 Botmatch component is more of a CPU test, and it's no surprise to see the Athlon 64 3400+ right at the top of the chart. The Intel side is nowhere to be seen, and AMD's newest 64-bit processor even squeaks by the Athlon 64 FX-51.

    X2 - The Threat Demo Performance

    The X2 - The Threat Demo is a tough gaming benchmark that takes the form of a rolling demo. It may be technically DirectX 8 in design, but its high-end 3D support and features make this a serious test for current 3D games, and not far removed from our DirectX 9 benchmarking. Once started, the X2 demo displays various game scenes, and incorporates the space-sim aspects of the game into a test run that can really separate the high-end hardware from the pack.

    The X2 Demo benchmark testing gets us back to the standard rankings, with the Athlon 64 3400+ ruling mainstream area, and the Athlon FX-51 providing the highest performance result. The benchmark placement is about what we expected when starting the comparison testing, and is a good indication of overall 3D game rankings.


    Page 1 Athlon 64 3400+: High End for the Mainstream
    Page 2 Performance and Test Systems
    Page 3 Business & CC Winstone 2004 and MPEG-2 Encoding
    Page 4 MPEG-2 Encoding & SiSoft SANDRA 2004 Performance
    Page 5 PCMark Pro 2004 Performance
    Page 6 Quake 3, Wolfenstein: ET, and Comanche 4 Performance
  • Page 7 Unreal Tournament 2003 & X2: Demo Performance
    Page 8 3DMark 2003, AquaMark 3 & GunMetal Performance
    Page 9 Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion

    Copyright(c) 2007 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy