logo
wwwsharky
quicksearch


start menu
Home
Forum
PC Buyers
CPU Prices
RAM Prices
Compare Prices
About Us
spacer
bend
Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles April 6, 2011
bend
spacer
Get the latest reviews and tutorials!
Register for the free
Hardware Daily Newsletter!




 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



RSS feed


Be a Marketplace Partner






internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers


CPU Reviews & Articles

spacer  

Pentium 4-3.2E and 3.4 GHz EE Processor Review

By Vince Freeman :  February 2, 2004

PCMark 2004 Pro Performance

PCMark 2004 Pro is a much-needed upgrade to the standard 2002 version, and along with adapting to the ever-changing hardware world, FutureMark has also added some new tests. The PCMark 2004 design still cuts a line between purely synthetic and application-based benchmarks, and provides a more general view of computer performance. PCMark 2004 performs general use tasks such as image compression, grammar check, and audio conversion, while combining this with a selection of similar benchmarks for individual system components. As we're dealing with processors and subsystem performance, the main tests we'll be looking at are the System, CPU and Memory results.

The PCMark 2004 System benchmark scores really favor the Pentium 4 side, and there is a near-perfect separation based on P4 core and speed rankings. The Pentium 4-3.4 GHz EE posted a new record score, while the Pentium 4 3.2E demonstrates a slight performance advantage compared to the Pentium 4 3.2 GHz Northwood. One key element of the PCMark 2004 suite is its use of multi-threaded tests, which gives the Intel Hyper-Threading processors a chance to really shine in the System and CPU performance sections.

The PCMark Pro 2004 CPU test scores are in approximately the same ranking, with the Pentium 4-3.4 GHz EE again taking the performance crown, while the Pentium 4 3.2E shows a bit more juice than its Northwood counterpart. Again, PCMark 2004 offers some multi-threaded CPU testing, and allows the Pentium 4 HT-enabled processors a chance to strut their stuff against the AMD competition.

PCMark 2004 Memory benchmark testing evens the ground somewhat, and now its pure memory performance at stake. The Pentium 4 crop once again posts impressive scores, but can't match the integrated dual-channel DDR controller of the Athlon 64 FX-51. When comparing within the Pentium 4 scores, we once again see the Pentium 4 3.2E out to a slim lead over the basic Pentium 4-3.2 GHz, and the Pentium 4-3.4 and 3.2 GHz Extreme Edition models at the top of the Intel scale.



Page 1

The Pentium 4-3.2E & Pentium 4-3.4 GHz EE Processors

Page 2

Performance and Test Systems

Page 3

Business & CC Winstone 2004 and MPEG-2 Encoding

Page 4

MPEG-1 Encoding & SiSoft SANDRA 2004 Performance

  • Page 5

    PCMark 2004 Pro Performance

    Page 6

    Quake 3, Wolfenstein: ET, and Comanche 4 Performance

    Page 7

    Unreal Tournament 2003 & X2: Demo Performance

    Page 8

    3DMark 2003, AquaMark 3 & GunMetal Performance

    Page 9

    Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion





    Internet.com
    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers