logo
wwwsharky
quicksearch


start menu
Home
Forum
PC Buyers
CPU Prices
RAM Prices
Compare Prices
About Us
spacer
bend
Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles July 3, 2011
bend
spacer
Get the latest reviews and tutorials!
Register for the free
Hardware Daily Newsletter!




 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



RSS feed


Be a Marketplace Partner






internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers


CPU Reviews & Articles

spacer  

Pentium 4 560 and 3.4 GHz EE LGA775 Processor Review

By Vince Freeman :  June 19, 2004

SiSoft SANDRA 2004 SP1 Performance

SiSoft SANDRA 2004 SP1 is the latest revision of this popular system benchmark, but it sticks to its roots and supplies a wide range of individual benchmarks and system utilities. These include processor, system, network, hard drive benchmarks and many other performance tests. The integer and floating-point memory bandwidth tests are the most popular section of the SiSoft SANDRA benchmark suite, and highlight the potential performance levels of the CPU-memory subsystem.

While we saw Intel moving up the chart in PCMark 2004, the trends are not the same in the SiSoft SANDRA 2004 SP1 memory bandwidth scores. Here we see the new LGA775 Pentium 4 560 falling back a bit from the Pentium 4-3.4E GHz results, while the Pentium 4-3.4 GHz EE (LGA775) posts a slight improvement over its Socket 478 sibling. It's tough to read anything concrete into the SANDRA scores, but it's obvious that the individual tests are not as conducive to DDR2, as the PCMark 2004 ones.

The SiSoft SANDRA 2004 Floating Point Bandwidth scores show the same basic trends at the Integer results, and we still see the same contradictions between the LGA Pentium 4 560 and 3.4 GHz EE, and their Socket 478-based counterparts.

CINEBENCH 2003 Performance

CINEBENCH 2003 is a system benchmark that uses CINEMA 4D for both CPU and video-based testing. As this is a processor review, we're concentrating on the CPU score, which incidentally, supports both multi-processing and Hyper-Threading.

CINEBENCH 2003 really shows off the benefits of Intel Hyper-Threading, but the 925X vs. i875P comparison doesn't give a real advantage or disadvantage to either platform. For direct comparisons, HT gives an approximate 1.2X increase in overall CINEBENCH 2003 performance..



Page 1

The Pentium 4 LGA775 Processors

Page 2

The LGA775 Platform, Hardware and Features

Page 3

Performance and Test Systems

Page 4

Business & Content Creation Winstone 2004 Performance

Page 5

PCMark 2004 Pro Performance

  • Page 6

    SiSoft SANDRA 2004 & CINEBENCH 2003 Performance

    Page 7

    MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Encoding Performance

    Page 8

    UT 2004, Comanche 4 & AquaMark 3 CPU Performance

    Page 9

    Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion





    Internet.com
    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers