logo
wwwsharky
quicksearch


start menu
Home
Forum
PC Buyers
CPU Prices
RAM Prices
Compare Prices
About Us
spacer
bend
Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles May 26, 2011
bend
spacer
Get the latest reviews and tutorials!
Register for the free
Hardware Daily Newsletter!




 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



RSS feed


Be a Marketplace Partner






internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers


CPU Reviews & Articles

spacer  

AMD Sempron 2800+ and 3100+ Processor Review

By Vince Freeman :  July 28, 2004

PCMark 2004 Pro Performance

PCMark 2004 Pro is a much-needed upgrade to the standard 2002 version, and along with adapting to the ever-changing hardware world, FutureMark has also added some new tests. The PCMark 2004 design still cuts a line between purely synthetic and application-based benchmarks, and provides a more general view of computer performance. PCMark 2004 performs general use tasks such as image compression, grammar check, and audio conversion, while combining this with a selection of similar benchmarks for individual system components. As we're dealing with processor and subsystem performance, the main tests we'll be looking at are the System, CPU and Memory results.

PCMark 2004 has historically been a tough benchmark for AMD, especially when put against the highest-end Pentium 4 models. This time out, the Sempron 2800+ doesn't have to worry about Hyper-Threading, and posts an extremely close victory over the Celeron 335. The Sempron 3100+ doesn't fare quite as well, and even though the overall score is good, the new AMD value processor can't match the Athlon XP 2800+ or the two Pentium 4 2.8 GHz models in overall PCMark 2004 System performance.

The PCMark 2004 Memory benchmark tells us more about the different architectures than just the processors, but memory bandwidth is a very important facet of overall performance. The Sempron 2800+ falls well back of the Celeron 335, due to the lower CPU bus and resultant lower memory scores. The Celeron 335 still uses a quad-pumped 133 (533 MHz) CPU bus, and can make better use of the dual-channel DDR333. The Sempron 3100+ and its integrated DDR controller puts AMD back on even ground, and although it still can't match the higher-end Pentium 4-2.8 GHz scores, AMD's new value entrant does post the highest mark on the AMD side.

The PCMark 2004 Pro CPU benchmarking can make good use of the Intel Hyper-Threading feature to really rack up the points. This is clear in the Sempron 3100+ testing, as the Pentium 4-2.8E really takes it to the competition. The Sempron 3100+ does post a nice score, but still ranks behind the Athlon XP 2800+ and Pentium 2-2.8 GHz processors. Even without HT, the Celeron 335 still manages to outpace the Sempron 2800+, and even rises above the Sempron 3100+.



Page 1

The AMD Sempron 2800+ and 3100+ Processors

Page 2

Performance and Test Systems

Page 3

Business & Content Creation Winstone 2004 Performance

  • Page 4

    PCMark 2004 Pro Performance

    Page 5

    SiSoft SANDRA 2004 & CINEBENCH 2003 Performance

    Page 6

    MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Encoding Performance

    Page 7

    Quake 3, Wolf: ET & Comanche 4 Performance

    Page 8

    UT 2003, UT 2004 & Halo Performance

    Page 9

    AquaMark 3, X2: Demo & Final Fantasy XI Performance

    Page 10

    Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion





    Internet.com
    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers