logo
wwwsharky
quicksearch


start menu
Home
Forum
PC Buyers
CPU Prices
RAM Prices
Compare Prices
About Us
spacer
bend
Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles February 3, 2012
bend
spacer
Get the latest reviews and tutorials!
Register for the free
Hardware Daily Newsletter!




 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



RSS feed










CPU Reviews & Articles

spacer  

Athlon 64 3500+ 90nm Processor Review

By Vince Freeman :  December 31, 2004

PCMark 2004 Pro Performance

PCMark 2004 Pro is a much-needed upgrade to the standard 2002 version, and along with adapting to the ever-changing hardware world, FutureMark has also added some new tests. The PCMark 2004 design still cuts a line between purely synthetic and application-based benchmarks, and provides a more general view of computer performance. PCMark 2004 performs general use tasks such as image compression, grammar check, and audio conversion, while combining this with a selection of similar benchmarks for individual system components. As we're dealing with processor and subsystem performance, the main tests we'll be looking at are the System, CPU and Memory results.

PCMark 2004 Pro shows us an almost perfect separation between the various AMD processors, as well as showing that the newer 90nm Athlon 64 3500+ is virtually equivalent to the performance level of the 130nm model. The updated processor does squeeze out a slight performance victory, but the percentage gap is almost nonexistent. We also see a continued trend of the Athlon 64 3200+ (939-pin) showing a noticeable performance advantage compared to the Athlon 64 3000+, almost as if 2.0 GHz or higher is where the Socket 939 architecture starts to shine.

The PCMark 2004 Pro Memory benchmarking section is where we see the main advantage of the Socket 939 design, and all of the dual-channel DDR, 939-pin processors show a significant advantage compared to the single-channel DDR Athlon 64 3400+. When taken alone, this benchmark does bring into question the AMD model numbers, but as the Socket 754 models run at a higher clock speed (approximately 200 MHz) than their same-name Socket 939 counterparts, it does tend to even out.

The PCMark 2004 Pro CPU testing again shows us the value of a higher clock speed. The three 2.2 GHz processors finish in a virtual dead-heat, and the 2.0 GHz Athlon 64 3200+ and 1.8 GHz Athlon 64 3000+ models fall right in line. As the memory benchmarks gave the advantage to 939-pin models, the higher relative clock speed of the Socket 754 processors help make up the difference.


Page 1

The Athlon 64 3500+ & 90nm Winchester Core

Page 2

Performance and Test Systems

Page 3

Business Winstone, CINEBENCH and MPEG-2 Performance

  • Page 4

    PCMark 2004 Pro Performance

    Page 5

    DOOM 3, FarCry and Halo Performance

    Page 6

    Unreal Tournament 2004 & 3DMark 2005 Performance

    Page 7

    Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion