Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles March 15, 2010





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- SanDisk's SSD As Rapid As It Is Reliable
- OCZ Launches Limited-Edition SSD
- AMD Offers Low-Profile DirectX 11 Graphics Card
- Microsoft Gaming Keyboard Has Awesome Anti-Ghosting
- Matrox Lets Multi-Monitor Fans Double Up
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards


  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers



  •   


    Pentium 4 670 & Pentium D 820 Processors Review
    By Vince Freeman :  June 15, 2005

    PCMark 2004 Pro Performance

    PCMark 2004 Pro is the latest edition of the popular system benchmarking tool and along with adapting to the ever-changing hardware world, FutureMark has also added some new tests. The PCMark 2004 design still cuts a line between purely synthetic and application-based benchmarks, and provides a more general view of computer performance. PCMark 2004 performs general use tasks such as image compression, grammar check, and audio conversion, while combining this with a selection of similar benchmarks for individual system components. As we're dealing with processor and subsystem performance, the main tests we'll be looking at are the System, CPU and Memory results.

    PCMark 2004 Pro offers a bit different view of overall system performance, due in part to its support of newer technologies. The Pentium 4 670 manages to exceed the 6K mark, and even surpasses the score of the powerful Pentium 4-3.73 GHz EE. Of course, the Pentium Extreme Edition 840 uses its quad-processing power to take the overall title, while the i945G's integrated graphics take a serious toll on overall performance, so much so that even the Pentium D 820 posts a higher score.

    The memory performance scores tell a different tale, and really give the advantage to the higher bus speeds. Since the Pentium 4-3.73 GHz utilizes the 1066 MHz CPU bus, it naturally scores much higher than the AMD and Intel competition, but the 3.8 GHz Pentium 4 670 acquits itself well in the dual-channel DDR400 world. Using the integrated graphics of the i945G only drops the score by a very small amount, but the lower 2.8 GHz clock speed of the Pentium D 820 takes a higher toll.

    The PCMark 2004 CPU benchmarking offers a bit of the old and new, as it not only rewards old school CPU performance, but supports technologies like multi-threading as well. The combination of a 3.8 GHz clock and HT support make the Pentium 4 670 a serious contender, and outside of the insane performance of the Pentium EE 840 (with four logical processors), it posts the highest overall score. The i945G and its integrated graphics core is a non-issue as far as CPU performance is concerned, and while the Pentium D 820 posts the lowest Intel score, it still manages to outpace the entire AMD contingent.



    Page 1 The Pentium 4 670 and Pentium D 820 Processors
    Page 2 The Intel 945G Express Platform
    Page 3 Performance and Test Systems
    Page 4 Business & Content Creation Winstone 2004 Performance
  • Page 5 PCMark 2004 Pro Performance
    Page 6 SANDRA 2005, ScienceMark 2 & CINEBENCH 2003 Performance
    Page 7 MPEG-1/2, DivX and WME Encoding Performance
    Page 8 Quake 3, FarCry & Half-Life 2 Performance
    Page 9 DOOM 3, UT 2003 & UT 2004 Performance
    Page 10 3DMark 2005, AquaMark 3 & Halo Performance
    Page 11 Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2010 QuinStreet Inc. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers