Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles March 14, 2010





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- SanDisk's SSD As Rapid As It Is Reliable
- OCZ Launches Limited-Edition SSD
- AMD Offers Low-Profile DirectX 11 Graphics Card
- Microsoft Gaming Keyboard Has Awesome Anti-Ghosting
- Matrox Lets Multi-Monitor Fans Double Up
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards


  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers



  •   


    Athlon 64 X2 4600+ & 4200+ Processor Review
    By Vince Freeman :  November 18, 2005

    PCMark05 Pro Performance

    PCMark05 Professional is the latest update to the popular PCMark system benchmarking series from FutureMark, and it has been revamped to highlight current hardware and features additional multithreaded and multi-tasking performance tests. There is the usual selection of individual System, CPU, Memory, Graphics, and Hard Drive benchmark suites, and these continue to bridge the gap between synthetic and application-based benchmarks. For our purposes, the System, CPU and Memory areas will be where we concentrate our benchmarking efforts.

    The PCMark05 System benchmark suite includes a wide range of tests, from Windows XP hard drive startup to video and audio encoding, and features a selection of standard desktop routines like text edit, virus scanning, and image decompression. Three of the benchmark scenarios are multithreaded, with the first two including two simultaneous tests, and the final one utilizing four program tests running simultaneously. This helps make PCMark05 System benchmark a great analysis tool for our dual core processors.

    The System scores for our PCMark05 benchmarking again show a very tight race between the Athlon 64 X2 Toledo and Manchester cores, and there is very little to choose from when comparing the scores. In a bit of a surprise, it's not an AMD processor taking the lead in this benchmark, and instead the Pentium Extreme Edition 840 using its quad threaded power to slip ahead of the 2.4 GHz Athlon 64 X2 processors.

    The PCMark05 Memory performance scores are quite a bit different, and here it's once again the AMD processors that take charge. It's still a tight race between the Athlon 64 X2 models with 1MB and 512K of L2 cache per core, but this time it's the Athlon 64 X2 4600+ and 4200+ with a slight lead over their Toledo counterpart. Clock speed does pay serious dividends in this particular test, as evidenced by the low results posted by the 2.0 GHz Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

    The CPU portion of PCMark05 also features a collection of multithreaded tasks, with these being configured similar to the System testing, running two or four programs simultaneously. The benchmark results have also shifted noticeably, and here the Pentium EE 840 and Pentium D models take charge, and outpace their AMD competition. While it's not surprising to see the HT-enabled Pentium EE 840 out in front, given the dual and quad-threaded nature of the CPU tests, it is a bit strange that even the Pentium D can take it to the Athlon 64 X2 processors.



    Page 1 The Athlon 64 X2 4600+ and 4200+ Processors
    Page 2 Performance and Test Systems
    Page 3 PCMark04 Pro Performance
  • Page 4 PCMark05 Pro Performance
    Page 5 SANDRA 2005, ScienceMark 2 & CINEBENCH 2003 Performance
    Page 6 MPEG-1/2, DivX and WME Encoding Performance
    Page 7 Quake 3, UT 2003 & UT 2004 Performance
    Page 8 DOOM 3, FarCry and Half-Life 2 Performance
    Page 9 3DMark05, AquaMark 3 & Halo Performance
    Page 10 Quake 4, Painkiller and CoR Performance
    Page 11 Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2010 QuinStreet Inc. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers