Datasheet: Software Compliance--Keep your organization's license usage compliant. Click here!




 Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles March 31, 2007


 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links

 
Search
 




 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- Acer Unveils Affordable Standard and Widescreen Monitors
- Microsoft, DigitalPersona Offer Keyboards With Something Extra
- AverMedia Intros Analog + Digital TV Tuner
- Speedy Storage Solutions from Intel, Seagate, and SanDisk
- HP Office Desktops First To Meet Energy Star 4.0 Specs
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review
- Unreal Tournament 2004 Review

Buyer's Guides

- March Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- January High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- December Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Processor Review
    - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Processor Review

  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards

    - Gigabyte GeForce 7600 GS 256MB SLI Review
    - ASUS EAX1950PRO 256MB Review
    - Albatron GeForce 7950GX2 1GB Review
    - ASUS EAX1650XT 256MB Review

    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner
    Online Universities
    KVM Switches
    Register Domain Name
    Corporate Gifts
    Desktop Computers
    Cell Phone Plans
    Web Hosting Directory
    Online Booking Hotels
    Auto Insurance Quote
    Franchise Directory
    Business Lists
    Computer Deals
    Dental Insurance
    Merchant Accounts

    internet.com
    Developer
    International
    Internet Lists
    Internet News
    Internet Resources
    IT
    Linux/Open Source
    Personal Technology
    Small Business
    Windows Technology
    xSP Resources
    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


  •   


    Athlon 64 FX-60 Processor Review
    By Vince Freeman :  January 10, 2006

    Introduction

    Dual core CPU technology definitely took the hardware world by storm in 2005, and from all appearances, look for this trend to continue in 2006. The benefits are very clear, as not only does a new dual core system offer cutting-edge multithreaded performance, but also ultra smooth multi-tasking as well. The ability to perform heavy-duty tasks in the background while system responsiveness stays high, is something that everyone should experience. Overall performance levels continue to improve, and clock speeds are also moving up the chart as well, as both AMD and Intel release higher-clocked dual core models. In fact, Intel has formally moved over to the dual core desktop with their last two processor lines, and AMD has made a very bold move in the same direction, with the release of the dual core Athlon 64 FX-60.

    The Athlon 64 FX-60 Processor

    The Athlon 64 FX line really stands for an ideology of personal computing: to offer the fastest gaming performance bar none, and let pricing be damned. That philosophy has held true through all previous iterations of the Athlon 64 FX, right up to the present Athlon 64 FX-57. However, AMD has recently changed gears and proposed that the Athlon 64 FX not be limited to the gaming arena, but will shift towards a more "highest performing desktop" mission statement. To do this in today's environment means transitioning to a dual or multi-core design, and this is exactly what AMD has done with the Athlon 64 FX-60.

    The new Athlon 64 FX-60 may sport an FX-based processor brand name, but its architecture shares more in common with the high-end Athlon 64 X2 models. The Athlon 64 FX-60 processor itself uses a 90nm Toledo core, which is comprised of dual San Diego cores on a single die. This translates into a full 1-MB of L2 cache per core, and 64K of L1 instruction and 64K of L1 data cache, or a total of 256KB of L1 and 2-MB of L2 cache per processor. If this sounds a whole lot like an Athlon 64 X2 4800+ or 4400+, you'd be right, and AMD looks to have split off their dual-tiered X2 line at this point, with the FX brand taking over the Toledo core.

    The Athlon 64 FX-60 is a standard Socket 939 processor that follows right in the footsteps of the Athlon 64 X2 4800+. Since it features a Toledo core with 2x1-MB L2 cache, this means a full transistor count of 233 million and die size of 199mm2. The thermal power requirement also remains unchanged at 110W and the new processor uses a core voltage of 1.30-1.35V. Naturally, the Athlon 64 FX-60 supports AMD64 and can run both 32- and 64-bit code, as well as featuring support for Cool 'n Quiet technology and Enhanced Virus Protection. The Athlon 64 FX-60, being an FX part, is also the first unlocked dual core model AMD has produced, and this feature can make it very attractive to overclockers.

    Core speed is another area we see a change, and the Athlon 64 FX-60 is clocked at 2.6 GHz, or 200 MHz higher than the nearest Athlon 64 X2 and 200 MHz lower than the fastest Athlon 64 FX single core. This positions it very well compared to the existing Athlon 64 X2 and Athlon 64 FX models, and most importantly, it maintains a 200 MHz advantage compared to the fastest Athlon 64 4000+ or Athlon 64 X2 4800+ models. In terms of physical design and core speed, the Athlon 64 FX-60 is really a hypothetical Athlon 64 5200+ release under the old format, or a Toledo core running at 2.6 GHz. Now that AMD has shifted the latest Toledo model to the Athlon 64 FX line, and will want to keep it top dog for a while, don't expect a competing 2.6 GHz Athlon 64 5000+ Manchester to be released anytime soon.


  • Page 1 The Athlon 64 FX-60 Processor
    Page 2 Test Setup and Benchmark Software
    Page 3 PCMark04 Pro Performance
    Page 4 PCMark05 Pro Performance
    Page 5 SANDRA 2005, ScienceMark 2 & CINEBENCH 2003 Performance
    Page 6 MPEG-1/2, DivX 6.1 and WME Encoding Performance
    Page 7 Quake 3, UT 2003 & UT 2004 Performance
    Page 8 DOOM 3, FarCry and Half-Life 2 Performance
    Page 9 3DMark 2005, AquaMark 3 & Halo Performance
    Page 10 Quake 4, Painkiller and CoR Performance
    Page 11 Benchmark Analysis, Overclocking, and Power Consumption
    Page 12 Value and Conclusion

    Sponsored Listings:

    Free 60-Day Trial
    New Sun x64 systems - try Sun Fire or Sun Ultra free for 60 days!
    www.sun.com


    Copyright(c) 2007 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy