Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles August 7, 2007


 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links

Voip - Voice over IP



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- Sony DVD Burners Boast 20X Recording Speed
- AverMedia ExpressCard Lets Laptops Tune In
- Corsair Touts Energy-Saving Power Supplies
- Logitech Debuts New Gaming Mouse, Revised Keyboard
- Oysters Inspire New Acer Consumer Notebook Designs
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- July Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- June High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- May Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - Athlon X2 BE-2350 Processor Review

  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards

    - PNY GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB Review

    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner
    Franchise Directory
    Domains for Business
    Marketing Products
    Jewish Dating
    Printers & Supplies
    Rackmount LCD Monitor
    Boat Donations
    Car Donation
    Promotional Gifts
    Promotional Items
    Imprinted Promotions
    PDA Phones & Cases
    Mp3 Player Reviews
    Computer Deals

    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology
    International

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


  •   


    Athlon 64 FX-60 Processor Review
    By Vince Freeman :  January 10, 2006

    PCMark04 Pro Performance

    PCMark04 Pro is a popular system benchmarking tool and along with adapting to the ever-changing hardware world, FutureMark has added some new tests. The PCMark04 design still cuts a line between purely synthetic and application-based benchmarks, and provides a more general view of computer performance. PCMark04 performs general use tasks such as image compression, grammar check, and audio conversion, while combining this with a selection of similar benchmarks for individual system components. As we're dealing with processor and subsystem performance, the main tests we'll be looking at are the System, CPU and Memory results.

    Before the dual core revolution, the PCMark04 Pro System test was a landslide victory for the Intel side, as the benchmark made use of both high clock speed and Hyper-Threading support. As you can see from the chart below, those days are long gone, and now that AMD has its own multithreading speed demons, the Athlon 64 FX-60 is in a class by itself. Only the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Pentium EE 955 come close, and the Athlon 64 FX-57 and Pentium 4-3.73 GHz EE scores show how single-threaded AMD and HT-enabled Intel processors used to stack up, while now even the 2.0 GHz Athlon 64 X2 3800+ posts a higher score.

    The new Athlon 64 FX-60 puts in a very impressive PCMark04 Memory performance score, ranking it the best in the Athlon 64 dual core bracket, but the 1066 MHz Intel processors again take the top spot. Both the Pentium EE 955 and Pentium 4-3.73 GHz EE are well over the 6K mark, and it's actually the Athlon 64 FX-57 keeping AMD close, and outpacing the dual core AMD line. Intel is in the same boat, with the single core Pentium 4-3.73 GHz EE outperforming the Pentium EE 955.

    The PCMark04 CPU benchmarking gets the Athlon 64 FX-60 back on track, and it is the first processor to score above 7K at SE. This new CPU has some serious juice, and not only powers ahead of the Athlon 64 X2 models, but makes quick work of the single-core Athlon 64 FX-57 and Pentium 4-3.73 GHz EE.


    Page 1 The Athlon 64 FX-60 Processor
    Page 2 Test Setup and Benchmark Software
  • Page 3 PCMark04 Pro Performance
    Page 4 PCMark05 Pro Performance
    Page 5 SANDRA 2005, ScienceMark 2 & CINEBENCH 2003 Performance
    Page 6 MPEG-1/2, DivX 6.1 and WME Encoding Performance
    Page 7 Quake 3, UT 2003 & UT 2004 Performance
    Page 8 DOOM 3, FarCry and Half-Life 2 Performance
    Page 9 3DMark 2005, AquaMark 3 & Halo Performance
    Page 10 Quake 4, Painkiller and CoR Performance
    Page 11 Benchmark Analysis, Overclocking, and Power Consumption
    Page 12 Value and Conclusion

    Copyright(c) 2007 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy