CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices

Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles July 27, 2007

 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links

 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking

Latest News

- Corsair Touts Energy-Saving Power Supplies
- Logitech Debuts New Gaming Mouse, Revised Keyboard
- Oysters Inspire New Acer Consumer Notebook Designs
- Best Buy Shoppers Get Dibs on New Envision Monitor
- Logitech Says Curved Keyboard Has No Learning Curve
News Archives


- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- July Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- June High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- May Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide


  • CPUs

    - Athlon X2 BE-2350 Processor Review

  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards

    - PNY GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB Review

    Be a Commerce Partner
    Register Domain
    Dental Insurance
    Build a Server Rack
    Home Mortgage Loans
    Promotional Pens
    Cheap Plasma TVs
    Free Credit Score
    Web Design
    Web Hosting Directory
    Plasma Televisions
    Promotional Items
    Condos For Sale
    Economy Server Racks

    Internet Lists
    Internet News
    Internet Resources
    Linux/Open Source
    Personal Technology
    Small Business
    Windows Technology
    xSP Resources
    Search internet.com
    Corporate Info
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


    Athlon 64 FX-60 Processor Review
    By Vince Freeman :  January 10, 2006

    SiSoft SANDRA 2005 Performance

    SiSoft SANDRA 2005 is the latest revision of this popular system benchmark, but it sticks to its roots and supplies a wide range of individual benchmarks and system utilities. These include processor, system, network, hard drive benchmarks and many other performance tests. The memory bandwidth test is the most popular section of the SiSoft SANDRA benchmark suite, and highlights the potential performance levels of the CPU-memory subsystem. As the Integer and FPU scores are quite similar, we are only including the first one in our benchmark suite.

    SiSoft SANDRA benchmarking shows many of the same trends we witnessed in the PCMark04 and 05 Memory benchmark testing. The Athlon 64 FX-60 again posts the highest AMD dual core result, but the Athlon 64 FX-57 manages to slide ahead and take the AMD performance crown. The 1066 MHz Pentium EE 955 and Pentium 3.73 GHz EE (the overall winner again) are the top overall performers, and these both place well ahead of the competition. The higher bus speed pays incredible dividends on the Intel side, as you can see by comparing these scores to the 800 MHz Pentium D crop.

    ScienceMark 2 Performance

    We have incorporated the ScienceMark 2 memory benchmark to our suite, and more specifically the MemBench portion of the program. This high-end test utilizes a series of memory bandwidth algorithms, and then offers a measure of the overall memory bandwidth of a given CPU/memory/platform combination. In many ways, it is similar to SiSoft SANDRA in terms of output and format, but depending on the platform and CPU, the actual tests can offer a slightly different result.

    The ScienceMark 2 benchmark scores are bunched closer together, but in terms of overall trends, nothing much has changed. The Athlon 64 FX-60 does post a very high score, but the 1066 MHz Intel models power slightly ahead, while the Athlon 64 FX-57 again slides just ahead of AMD's newest dual core entry.

    CINEBENCH 2003 Performance

    CINEBENCH 2003 is a system benchmark that uses CINEMA 4D for both CPU and video-based testing. This benchmark processes a large, detailed image file on-screen, times the overall performance, and displays the results. As this is a processor review, we're concentrating on the CPU score, which incidentally, can utilize multi-processing and Hyper-Threading.

    Last time out, it was the Pentium EE 955 posting a new record in CINEBENCH 2003, but it certainly didn't take AMD long to break it again. The Athlon 64 FX-60 comes in strong with a performance mark just shy of 700, and this is without the Hyper-Threading boost that the top-end Intel models enjoy. Also notice the much lower performance of the single core CPUs, and even with HT support, the Pentium 4-3.73 GHz cannot even approach true dual core performance levels.

    CINEBENCH 2003 also supplies a rating for the multi-threaded performance compared to single-threaded. The Athlon 64 FX-60 and other Athlon 64 X2 dual core models post a 1.8X to 1.9X increase, the Pentium EE 955 and 840 processors lead the pack with a 2.15X increase, and the Pentium D processors offer a 1.7X performance multiplier. The HT-enabled Pentium 4-3.73 GHz also gets a slight boost in the order of 1.2X, while the single core Athlon 64 FX-57 obviously receives none.

    Page 1 The Athlon 64 FX-60 Processor
    Page 2 Test Setup and Benchmark Software
    Page 3 PCMark04 Pro Performance
    Page 4 PCMark05 Pro Performance
  • Page 5 SANDRA 2005, ScienceMark 2 & CINEBENCH 2003 Performance
    Page 6 MPEG-1/2, DivX 6.1 and WME Encoding Performance
    Page 7 Quake 3, UT 2003 & UT 2004 Performance
    Page 8 DOOM 3, FarCry and Half-Life 2 Performance
    Page 9 3DMark 2005, AquaMark 3 & Halo Performance
    Page 10 Quake 4, Painkiller and CoR Performance
    Page 11 Benchmark Analysis, Overclocking, and Power Consumption
    Page 12 Value and Conclusion

    Copyright(c) 2007 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy
    Maximizing the Performance of SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time for Financial Services Applications on AMD64 Technology

    Real-World Performance of SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time

    Technical Whitepaper: SUSE Enterprise Linux Real Time