Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles March 13, 2010





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- SanDisk's SSD As Rapid As It Is Reliable
- OCZ Launches Limited-Edition SSD
- AMD Offers Low-Profile DirectX 11 Graphics Card
- Microsoft Gaming Keyboard Has Awesome Anti-Ghosting
- Matrox Lets Multi-Monitor Fans Double Up
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards


  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers



  •   


    Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Processor Review
    By Vince Freeman :  February 20, 2007

    Everest Ultimate Edition 2006 Performance

    In order to give yet another view of memory performance, bandwidth and latency, we have incorporated the Everest Ultimate Edition 2006 into our benchmark mix. With many platforms changing to DDR2 or adapting to ever-increasing clock speeds, the question of memory performance has never been more important. The Everest benchmarking suite offers several different memory performance modules, and has quickly become a standard for many hardware evaluations.

    For this review, we use latest Everest Ultimate Edition version 3.5, which is essential for valid Athlon 64 X2/FX and Core 2 Duo/Extreme/Quad platform testing. Our benchmark testing centers on the Memory Read, Memory Write and Memory Latency tests, which should give us an overall view of the various platforms, and exactly how the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ stacks up.

    Our first Everest benchmark is the Memory Read test, and again we find the AMD dual core processors holding the top spots, even outperforming the Intel quad core models. But the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is not the top performers, as its lower DDR2 clock speed holds it back again, and it falls to the Athlon 64 FX-62 running at a full DDR2-800 clock.

    The Memory Write test is another huge victory for AMD, and now the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ sits on top with a very serious score. The write side of the equation doesn't seem to be hampered by the non-standard DDR2 clock speed, and instead seems to be linked to the clock speed.

    The memory latency benchmarks make it three for three for the AMD side. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ posts a memory latency of under 50 ns, but is again edged out of a pure victory by the Athlon 64 FX-62.



    Page 1 The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0 GHz Processor
    Page 2 Test Setup and Benchmark Software
    Page 3 PCMark05 Pro Performance
    Page 4 SiSoft SANDRA XI Memory and Multi-Core Performance
  • Page 5 Everest 2006 Ultimate Edition Performance
    Page 6 CINEBENCH 9.5, SANDRA XI and WinRAR CPU Performance
    Page 7 MPEG-1/2, DivX 6.4 and WME Encoding Performance
    Page 8 3DMark06 Pro, UT 2004 and Painkiller Performance
    Page 9 DOOM 3, FarCry and Half-Life 2 Performance
    Page 10 Quake 4, F.E.A.R. and CoR Performance
    Page 11 Company of Heroes, Prey and Splinter Cell: CT Performance
    Page 12 Benchmark Analysis and Power Consumption
    Page 13 Value and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2010 QuinStreet Inc. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers