Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles August 27, 2009





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- Intel Pushes Out Nehalem for High-End Desktops
- Microsoft Pushes Tupperware Parties for Nerds
- 2631
- 2631
- SanDisk Upgrades its USB Memory Card Readers
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte X48T-DQ6 Motherboard Review
    - Intel DX48BT2 (X48) Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


  •   


    AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE Review
    By Vince Freeman :  January 9, 2009

    Benchmark Analysis

    The overall benchmark results of the Phenom II X4 940 were kind of a mixed bag, with the new CPU posting some very impressive scores, while others didn't reach the level we had expected. The memory bandwidth scores showed some improvement, as did the PCMark suites, but nothing that significant. The gains in the media encoding benchmarks were very impressive, and showed off the advantages of a larger L3 cache coupled with a higher clock speed. A few games, like Unreal Tournament 3 and ET: Quake Wars, displayed framerates competitive with Intel, while the performance in others such as Company of Heroes and Crysis did improve, but still remained well back of the Core 2.

    Overclocking

    Whenever a company introduces a core shrink of an existing processor architecture, the question of overclocking certainly comes to mind. AMD's 45nm transition is no different, and is actually more enticing due to the pre-release overclocking hype the company bestowed on the Phenom II X4. Intel processors are regarded as having built-in overclocking headroom, and valid or not, AMD's default clock speeds are viewed as running at the ragged edge, with not much room to maneuver. That is a mindset AMD is looking to change.

    Our overclock testing included the standard reference configuration, supplemented by a Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme + 120mm fan, which is one of the best air coolers ever built. At a default clock speed of 3.0 GHz and a standard core voltage of approximately 1.33V, our first step was to see how high we could take the Phenom II X4 940 right out of the box. Without raising core voltages, we easily reached 3.2 GHz, and then 3.4 GHz before finally hitting a wall at 3.5 GHz. We booted at 3.5 GHz with no problem, but after loading Vista Ultimate, it would inevitably crash.

    After moving the core voltage to 1.4V, we were able to hit 3.5 and 3.6 GHz, but that was as high as we could take the Phenom II X4 940 and still keep the system stable. 1.45V allowed 3.7 GHz to boot, but we needed a bit more to go any higher and actually load Vista. In order to reach 3.8 GHz, the voltage was jacked to a full 1.5V, and even so, it took some additional tweaking to get it fully stable. We moved the voltage levels a bit higher, and did some experimenting, but that was as far as our particular Phenom II X4 would go.

    That was the end of our overclocking experiment, and no matter what we tried, our review Phenom II X4 940 would not go any higher. Both 3.9 and 4.0 GHz would easily boot, but became unstable either loading Vista Ultimate, or when testing for benchmark stability. This didn't seem to be a heat-related issue either, as the motherboard sensors reported values hovering around the 50-52 degrees C range.

    Total System Power Consumption Testing

    In order to measure power consumption, we took each of the AMD and Intel reference systems, ran the outlet through a Power Analyzer, and then compiled total system consumption figures (in Watts) for Idle and Load scenarios. In order to keep the systems and results consistent, we used the same configuration for the AMD and Intel processors as listed on the Test Systems page.

    The first test measures the total system power usage when the AMD and Intel processors are set to power-saving mode. For AMD, this means enabling Cool'n'Quiet, while for Intel we need to activate Enhanced SpeedStep. The test was performed after the operating system has loaded, and all of the various software and hardware components have initialized and we hit a consistent power reading.

    This first set of power usage results are amazing, and show the Phenom II X4 940 posting the lowest wattage of any quad core processor in the list. AMD has made some improvements to their Cool'n'Quiet support, and it really shows.

    The second test changes the operating conditions from Idle to Load, and the SANDRA Multimedia CPU benchmark pushes processor usage to 100%, while ensuring that no extraneous hard drive or peripheral activity artificially ramps up the power consumption rates. The results using SANDRA are also incredibly consistent, with the wattage numbers remaining stable through the entire test.

    Now that the processing load was increased, we expected the Phenom II X4 940 to move up the list, but surprisingly it does not, and holds tightly on to second place, and top among quads.

    Please keep in mind that these numbers relate to total system power consumption, of which the CPU is only one part. In evaluations like this, relative placing is sometimes more important than the base numbers, which can change based on the platform and peripheral mix.


    Page 1 The Phenom II X4 940 BE Architecture & Specs
    Page 2 Test Setup and Benchmark Software
    Page 3 PCMark05 Pro Performance
    Page 4 PCMark Vantage Performance
    Page 5 SiSoft SANDRA 2009 Performance
    Page 6 Everest Ultimate Edition Memory Performance
    Page 7 CINEBENCH 9.5/10 and WinRAR Performance
    Page 8 MPEG-2, DivX, WMV, and High-Def Video Encoding Performance
    Page 9 3DMark06 Pro, 3DMark Vantage and Crysis Performance
    Page 10 Company of Heroes, UT3, World in Conflict, & ET: Quake Wars Performance
  • Page 11 Benchmark Analysis, Overclocking and System Power Consumption
    Page 12 Value and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2009 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy


    internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

    Search:

    WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs