Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles July 1, 2009





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- 2631
- 2631
- SanDisk Upgrades its USB Memory Card Readers
- Maingear Introduces the GeForce 3D Vision-powered Prelude 2
- Nintendo Will Introduce the DSi Handheld on April 5
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte X48T-DQ6 Motherboard Review
    - Intel DX48BT2 (X48) Motherboard Review
    - AMD 790GX Chipset Review
    - Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DS5 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


  •   


    AMD Athlon XP 2000+ Review
    By Vince Freeman :  January 8, 2002

    SiSoft SANDRA 2001

    SiSoft SANDRA is an interesting suite of individual benchmarks and system utilities. These are artificial tests that can give a different view of processor and subsystem performance, far away from system tests. The benchmarks we are concerned with are the CPU Arithmetic, CPU Multi-Media, and Memory Bandwidth tests.

    The SiSoft SANDRA CPU Arithmetic tests outline the potential performance of the ALU (integer) and FPU (floating-point) portions of the CPU. In this area, we see a strange pattern start to emerge, as the Athlon XP 2000+ takes the ALU crown, while falling back quite a bit in FPU testing. In these tests, the platform mattered little and this helps isolate the theoretical performance of the processors.

    The CPU Multi-Media benchmarks are similar to the Arithmetic tests, except that the MMX and SSE/SSE2 capabilities of the processor are highlighted. Even after taking this into consideration, the Athlon XP 2000+ continues to lead on ALU/MMX benchmarking, while losing out to the Pentium 4 in FPU/SSE scores. One note of interest is how much ground the Athlon XP 2000+ makes up on the Pentium 4 once we add SSE to the mix. The Pentium 4-2.2 GHz has shrunk to almost nothing, which is a big change from the Arithmetic scores.

    One of the most popular sections of the SiSoft SANDRA suite is the memory bandwidth tests. Naturally, the dual-channel Pentium 4-2.2/i850 leads the pack by a wide margin, but even taking a pure DDR vs. DDR view shows the Athlon XP 2000+ falling behind the i845D. No amount of SSE enhancements is going to save it here, and the Pentium 4 Northwood's large cache seems to make a real difference with this benchmark. Check out the differential between the Pentium 4-2.0A and the standard Pentium 4-2.0 for further confirmation.



    Page 1 Introduction
    Page 2 Physical Architecture
    Page 3 Performance
  • Page 4 SiSoft SANDRA 2001
    Page 5 Business and Content Creation Winstone 2001
    Page 6 Video 2000 and 3DMark 2001
    Page 7 Quake3 and Serious Sam Performance
    Page 8 Benchmark Analysis
    Page 9 Value and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2009 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy


    internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

    Search:

    WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs