Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles March 17, 2010





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- SanDisk's SSD As Rapid As It Is Reliable
- OCZ Launches Limited-Edition SSD
- AMD Offers Low-Profile DirectX 11 Graphics Card
- Microsoft Gaming Keyboard Has Awesome Anti-Ghosting
- Matrox Lets Multi-Monitor Fans Double Up
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards


  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers



  •   


    AMD Athlon XP 2000+ Review
    By Vince Freeman :  January 8, 2002

    Video 2000 MPEG Encoding

    While many of the tests included in Video 2000 may be of questionable use (especially for performance testing) it does have one gem. The MPEG encoding portion of the suite is a pure CPU subsystem test that encodes frames in an MPEG animation and then displays a final framerate.

    Video 2000 is one of the few benchmarks where we find a noticeable difference between the nForce and KT266A. The Athlon XP 2000+/nForce combo scores the top mark overall, while the KT266A finishes in third, behind the Pentium 4-2.2 GHz. While the differential may seem small, this is a noticeable performance lead and can conceivably add a great of time to a huge MPEG encoding job.

    3DMark 2001 Pro

    MadOnion's 3DMark 2001 is a very popular 3D benchmark tool, and as long as the video component is kept consistent, then it is also an adequate system/CPU test as well. 3DMark 2001 also fills the dual role of doing some idea as to which processor may be the best fit for upcoming DirectX 8.X games. Benchmark testing was performed at 1024x768 using both 16 and 32-bit color/textures, and set for Pure Hardware T&L support.

    In 16-bit testing, the Pentium 4-2.2 GHz wins out by a slight margin over the Athlon XP 2000+. The situation changes when viewing the DDR platforms, as both the nForce and KT266A make short work of the i845D. Once we move to 32-bit mode, the Athlon XP 2000 takes over and outmatches all of the Pentium 4 competition.



    Page 1 Introduction
    Page 2 Physical Architecture
    Page 3 Performance
    Page 4 SiSoft SANDRA 2001
    Page 5 Business and Content Creation Winstone 2001
  • Page 6 Video 2000 and 3DMark 2001
    Page 7 Quake3 and Serious Sam Performance
    Page 8 Benchmark Analysis
    Page 9 Value and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2010 QuinStreet Inc. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers