Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme :


Latest News


- 2631
- 2631
- SanDisk Upgrades its USB Memory Card Readers
- Maingear Introduces the GeForce 3D Vision-powered Prelude 2
- Nintendo Will Introduce the DSi Handheld on April 5
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte X48T-DQ6 Motherboard Review
    - Intel DX48BT2 (X48) Motherboard Review
    - AMD 790GX Chipset Review
    - Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DS5 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards





  • Price: $119 to $179US

    Availability: Soon

    Not everyone can or wants to spend $300 for a top-of-the-line graphics card. Not everyone goes to extremes for a few extra fps. If you want excellent game performance but the urge isn't strong enough to burn a Texas sized hole in your pocket, NVIDIA has a new chip that might be just for you. It's called the GeForce2 MX, formerly known as NV11, and NVIDIA claims boards based on it will provide performance about equivalent to the GeForce 256 for only $119 to $179US, depending on added features. We managed to get ahold of a GeForce2 MX and put it through a round of benchmarking to bring you this guide.

    Since the .18 micron design of the GeForce2 MX leverages much of the GeForce2 GTS technology, we are going to compare the two when giving you the specifications. From here on, we will refer to them as the MX and GTS for short. For clarity, the original GeForce 256 will be called the 256.

    The MX is clocked at 175MHz, which is not too much less than the GTS at 200MHz. The MX has a second generation hardware transformation and lighting (T&L) engine that can process 20 million polygons per second, five million less than the GTS. This difference is due to the 25MHz clock speed difference.





    Copyright 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. About INT Media Group | Press Releases | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities