Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : Motherboards March 11, 2010





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- SanDisk's SSD As Rapid As It Is Reliable
- OCZ Launches Limited-Edition SSD
- AMD Offers Low-Profile DirectX 11 Graphics Card
- Microsoft Gaming Keyboard Has Awesome Anti-Ghosting
- Matrox Lets Multi-Monitor Fans Double Up
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards


  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers



  •   


    Pentium 4 Motherboard Roundup
    By Vince Freeman :  January 26, 2004

    Performance

    Determining overall performance levels for motherboards is a bit more difficult compared to processors or 3D video cards. Hardware and software consistency must be maintained, benchmarks should have some impact on overall system throughput, and the operating system and driver revisions must be standard. For our hardware reference base, we have selected the Pentium 4-3.2 GHz processor, along with 512-MB of Crucial TwinX PC3200 memory and an ATI Radeon 9800XT video card, all using Windows XP Pro SP1. This is a good approximation of a high-end Pentium 4 system and ensures that we are testing top-end features such as the 800 MHz FSB and Hyper-Threading technology.

    * Please note that the only time we changed up the hardware selection was to use PC4200 memory with the single-channel i848P motherboard, in order to demonstrate the impact of a higher memory bandwidth.

    * Many of the high-end i875P manufacturers list "certified DDR memory" for peak PAT operation on their motherboard, and we recommend checking out these listings before making any purchase. We used Corsair PC3200 TwinX with no problems in our benchmarking section, and followed that up with KingMax PC3200 for extra compatibility testing, but sticking with the manufacturer recommendations is always the safest course of action.

    The System BIOS is also an important area, and for all benchmarks, the settings have been standardized to a degree. All motherboards have been tested using the highest memory timings allowed, along with other performance settings equalized at the high-end. This tends to reward manufacturers that allow greater tweaking in the BIOS, while maintaining equal footing in terms of the components used.

    We do draw the line at bumping up the FSB at standard processor settings, or any other performance enhancing trickery. There are certain System BIOS options that do this very thing, as well as some selections that artificially increase system speeds. These have either been disabled or if needed, an equivalent FSB was selected manually (and confirmed via diagnostic software) to ensure an even playing field.

    The benchmark list features a wide range of system, CPU, memory, and gaming tests. These include the brand-new revisions of PCMark 2004 and SiSoft SANDRA 2004, along with popular 3D game tests like AquaMark 3, GunMetal, Unreal Tournament 2003, 3DMark 2003, Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory. X2 Demo, Code Creatures, and Comanche 4. Our default game benchmark setting is 1024x768x32, which is demanding enough for comparisons and more realistic as an actual gameplay resolution, but still allows the motherboard-CPU-memory subsystem to take control in relatively low-resolutions testing.

    * Please note that unless otherwise stated, all performance graph results equate to the standard "higher is better" routine.

    Test Systems

    General Settings:
    Desktop Resolution: 1024x768
    Color Depth: 32-bit
    V-Sync: Disabled

    Pentium 4 Reference System:
    Processors: Pentium 4-3.2 GHz
    Memory: 2 x 256-MB Corsair DDR400 DIMM
    ATI reference drivers: Catalyst 3.10
    Video Card: ATI Radeon 9800XT 256-MB
    Hard-Drive: Maxtor 80-GB ATA-133, 7200 RPM
    CD/DVD: AOpen Combo Drive
    Power Supply: Sparkle 400 Watt
    DirectX 9.0b
    Operating System: Windows XP Pro SP1

    Motherboards:

    AOpen AX4C Max
    ASUS P4P800S-E Deluxe
    ASUS P4P800 Deluxe
    ASUS P4C800 Deluxe
    DFI LANPARTY PRO875
    MSI 875P NEO-FIS2R
    Soyo i865PE Dragon 2
    Soyo i875P Dragon 2

    3DMark 2003 Specifics:
    Version 1.0 Patched 340

    GunMetal Benchmark Specifics:
    Version 1.20S

    SiSoft SANDRA 2004

    PCMark 2004 Pro Test Specifics:
    Build 100


    Page 1 Introduction
    Page 2 The AOpen AX4C Max
    Page 3 The ASUS P4P800S-E Deluxe
    Page 4 The ASUS P4P800 Deluxe
    Page 5 The ASUS P4C800 Deluxe
    Page 6 The DFI LANPARTY PRO875
    Page 7 The MSI 875P NEO-FIS2R
    Page 8 The Soyo SY-P4I865PE Plus Dragon 2
    Page 9 The Soyo P4I875P Plus Dragon 2 Platinum
  • Page 10 Performance and Test System
    Page 11 PCMark Pro 2004 & SANDRA 2004 Performance
    Page 12 Wolfenstein: ET, Comanche 4 & UT 2003 Performance
    Page 13 X2 Demo, Code Creatures & 3DMark 2003 Performance
    Page 14 AquaMark 3 & GunMetal Performance
    Page 15 Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2010 QuinStreet Inc. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers