CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices

Sharky Extreme : Motherboards April 13, 2009

Be a Marketplace Partner

 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links

 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking

Latest News

- SanDisk Upgrades its USB Memory Card Readers
- Maingear Introduces the GeForce 3D Vision-powered Prelude 2
- Nintendo Will Introduce the DSi Handheld on April 5
- Toshiba To Buy Fujitsu's Hard Drive Business
- Samsung to Produce High-Performance 50nm GDDR5
News Archives


- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide


  • CPUs

    - AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE & X4 810 Review

  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte X48T-DQ6 Motherboard Review
    - Intel DX48BT2 (X48) Motherboard Review
    - AMD 790GX Chipset Review
    - Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DS5 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards

    Be a Commerce Partner

    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Corporate Info
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


    VIA KT600 vs. NVIDIA nForce2 Ultra 400 Review
    By Vince Freeman :  February 19, 2004


    The Athlon XP motherboard market has quite a few chipset options, including several older models supporting the 266 and 333 MHz front-side bus. The current crop of high-end 400 MHz-compatible chipsets includes the VIA KT600 and NVIDIA nForce2 Ultra 400, and both are available in a wide range of motherboards. The move to the higher 400 MHz front-side bus, PC3200 DDR becoming a standard, and upgrades to onboard features mark a few of the transitions the Athlon XP motherboard market has undergone. We've selected a couple of motherboards featuring the KT600 and nForce2 chipsets, and will run them through the gamut of feature, performance, overclocking and price comparisons.

    The VIA KT600 Chipset

    The VIA KT600 is an evolutionary upgrade from the older KT400A chipset, and incorporates a few noted enhancements. The most obvious is support for the 266, 333 and 400 MHz front-side bus speeds, which allows the KT600 to make use of the high-end Athlon XP 3200+ processor. Memory support (up to 400 MHz) remains unchanged, with the KT600 still including a single-channel DDR400 capable memory controller. But with a synchronous 400 MHz CPU and memory bus speeds, the KT600 offers higher memory and system performance than the KT400A. Serial ATA and RAID support have also been added, and the VIA VT8237 features onboard RAID 0, RAID 1, and RAID 0+1. VIA has added 2 additional USB ports to the KT600, but other than this small change, the other features remain consistent with the KT400A design.

    The KT600 compares quite well to the nForce2 Ultra 400 in many ways, and actually outpaces it in terms of inherent SATA and RAID functionality. The other features remain fairly constant between the two platforms, with the obvious exception of the nForce2's dual-channel DDR400 memory controller, and the much higher bandwidth it affords. Of course, with a 400 MHz CPU bus, there is no requirement for a 2x400 MHz memory architecture, and this extra bandwidth really only comes into play with certain games and applications.

    In this article, we'll start off with a full review of the AOpen KT600 and MSI nForce2 Ultra 400 motherboards, and cover off features, board layout, installation, and BIOS options, before moving on to our usual application and game benchmarking, and offering a final conclusion.

    * In the following product reviews, we list the hardware and onboard features of the motherboards as reviewed, but keep in mind that some are optional components that may need to be confirmed before making any purchase.

  • Page 1 Introduction
    Page 2 The AOpen AK77-600 Max (KT600) Motherboard
    Page 3 The MSI K7N Delta-ILSR (nForce2 Ultra 400) Motherboard
    Page 4 Performance and Test System
    Page 5 Business & CC Winstone 2004 and PCMark 2004
    Page 6 PCMark 2004 & SANDRA 2004 Memory Performance
    Page 7 Quake 3, Wolf: ET, Comanche 4 & UT 2003 Performance
    Page 8 X2, AquaMark 3, 3DMark 2003 & GunMetal Performance
    Page 9 Benchmark Analysis, Value and Conclusion

    Copyright(c) 2009 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers