
On (left) - Off (right)
Much more than just an OEM checklist item, the current rage for features that stand out visually is real bump mapping (as opposed to the emboss method employed by hardware manufacturers up to now to preserve frame rate) and when properly used, it can be a feast for the eyes. It serves many purposes, one of which is creating the illusion of much more complex geometry. As we have seen with the Matron G400, the difference between bump mapped and non-bump mapped scenes is quite spectacular. The Neon 250 also employs hardware bump mapping. This card is not left out in the rain (embossed or otherwise) when it comes to high-end features.
Extensive 2D testing seems to be a thing of the past with 300MHz RAMDACs. And even though the Neon 250 managed to
whizz through the usual 2D Windows applications, with a 250MHz RAMDAC, it's not going to be the fastest on the
block. Matrox's G400MAX will sell with a 360MHz RAMDAC, so if 2D is something you worry about the Neon 250 won't
scream through in first place. The maximum resolution of 1920x1440 in 16bit at 65Hz or 1600x1200 in 32bit at 85Hz
is not as high as some of the Neon 250's competition.