Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme :

Biz Resources
Contact Management Software
Domain Name Services
Internet Security

Latest News


- Patriot Updates their DDR2 4GB PC2-8500 Line to "Revision 2"
- Mushkin Releases a New Line of Ascent Redline and XP eVCI-cooled Memory
- OCZ Hits 2.0 GHz using High-Density 2GB DDR3 Modules
- Dell Raises the Bar with Quad-CPU/Quad-Graphics XPS 730 H2 and H2C Gaming Systems
- Kingston Unleashes Low-Latency 800MHz HyperX FB-DIMMs for the Skulltrail
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- March Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- January High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - AMD Phenom X3 8750 Review
    - Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 Review
    - AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition Review
    - Back in Black: Phenom 9600 Black Edition Review

  • Motherboards

    - AMD 780G Chipset Review

  • Video Cards

    - ASUS EN8800GT TOP 512MB Review
    - Gigabyte GeForce 8800 GT 512MB Review
    - PNY XLR8 GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB Review




  • With Athlon systems costing upwards of $1,700+ at the time of the new CPU's launch in August, we weren't about to tell readers to "rush out and buy an Athlon system" which we considered a premature and irresponsible recommendation based on the recent Super 7 precedent we just detailed.

    One of the primary fallacies of logic is to make a hasty generalization to the masses from experience gained on a singular scale. Taking our early Athlon system's good stability and peripheral compatibility results, (which was provided from AMD themselves) and generalizing them to readers as if every single future Athlon system would perform the same way would be falling into that trap.

    But now, two months have passed since the Athlon's introduction, and we're happy to report that the Athlon platform continues to impress both our own staff and the many system integrators who manufacture Athlon-based PCs in terms of stability and peripheral compatibility.

    This feedback, from companies who have now purchased and sold thousands of Athlon systems, is a heck of a lot better control group to draw from than a single reviewer with a single Athlon PC when making sweeping recommendation statements to readers.

    The Athlon is now a pretty good-looking recipe for a power-system in our minds, but the entrée is about to get even tastier.

    Sharky Extreme has learned that out of the initial Athlon-supporting mainboards that are being manufactured by various overseas vendors for 1999, a minimum of two of them will support full control of the Athlon's clock speed and multiplier settings through their soft BIOS routines.

    Popular mainboard manufacturer ASUS will be one of the two overclockable Athlon board vendors, while the second is an overseas company that operates on a much smaller scale. Both should be available by November.

    This comes as great news for many readers as the thought of taking an Athlon 600 up to 650MHz, or today's Athlon 700 up to 750MHz is too good to resist.

    Let's take a look at the new Athlon 700 CPU, and see if it manages to outpace its competitors enough at its stock speed to justify its premium price tag.





    Copyright © 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. About INT Media Group | Press Releases | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities