Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme :


Latest News


- AMD Unleashes Six-Core Desktop CPU
- WD Doubles Capacity of Fastest SATA Drive
- Nvidia Announces Blazing GeForce GTX 480, 470 GPUs
- SanDisk's SSD As Rapid As It Is Reliable
- OCZ Launches Limited-Edition SSD
News Archives

Features

- PC Buyer's Guide for Gaming Enthusiasts -- January 2012
- PC Buyer's Guide for Entry-Level Gaming -- January 2012
- Build Your Own Gaming PC Guide -- Nov. 2011
- PC Buyer's Guide for Gaming Enthusiasts, August, 2011
- July Entry-Level Gaming PC Guide

Buyer's Guides

- PC Buyer's Guide for Entry-Level Gaming -- January 2012
- Build Your Own Gaming PC Guide -- Nov. 2011
- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards


  • Video Cards





  • Test system specs:
    • Intel Pentium III 500Mhz CPU
    • MSI 6163Pro Mainboard (Slot-1 / BX)
    • 256MB PC100 SDRAM
    • LeadTek GeForce SDR
    • Absolute Multimedia GeForce DDR
    • Absolute Multimedia TNT 2 Ultra (150 / 183)
    • Seagate UDMA 33 20Gb Harddrive
    • Xitel Storm Platinum 3D PCI Sound Card (Aureal Vortex 2)
    • Panasonic 5.2x DVD-ROM
    • Win98 / Direct X 7.0a
    Test Conditions and Specifications:
    All tests were run a total of four times with the results averaged to determine final score. VSync was OFF for all tests except DMZG where VSYNC was Enabled.

    3D Mark 2000, from MadOnion.com (formerly FutureMark) is a suite of benchmark tests designed to stress the Direct3D performance of your video accelerator by providing a controlled "real-world" gaming environment. Based on the Max-FX game engine and offering support for most of the features offered by DirectX 7 such as hardware T & L, SSE and 3Dnow! accelerated geometry calculations, Bump-mapping (yes, environmental as well) and more, 3D Mark 2000 has become our benchmark of choice for testing DirectX 7 performance and compliance. Now let's get on with the scores:

    As the benchmarks show, the TNT 2 Ultra is no match for its successor the GeForce 256. Yet performance has to be considered acceptable as most of the tests actually run very well, especially the ones where triangle throughput is of lesser importance than fillrate. The TNT 2 Ultra was also able to run the 1600 x 1200 @ 32bit test which for some reason (most likely driver related) the GeForce-based boards would not.





    Copyright © 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. About INT Media Group | Press Releases | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities