Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme :


Latest News


- Gateway Launches New Core i7-powered FX-Series Gaming PCs
- Asetek Liquid Cools the Intel Core i7
- Hercules Unveils the new XPS 2.150 Multimedia Speaker System
- MSI Adds an AMD Option to its Gaming Notebook Series
- Kingston Unleashes HyperX T1 Series Memory
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- July High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - Intel Core i7-965 XE & Core i7-920 Review

  • Motherboards

    - Intel DX48BT2 (X48) Motherboard Review
    - AMD 790GX Chipset Review
    - Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DS5 Motherboard Review
    - AMD 780G Chipset Review

  • Video Cards





  • By measuring a card's synthetic performance, we can stress individual points of the card, helping to identify problematic areas and accurately compare against other boards. For our synthetic measurements we've used 3D Mark 2000 which incorporates optimizations for D3D Hardware T&L (GeForce), D3D Software T&L (MAXX running on a Celeron) and Pentium III (MAXX running on the PIII systems). These benchmarks should uncover the theoretical strengths of T&L and expose any driver problems relating to Direct3D. Let's take a look at how our three contenders fare.



    In 16-bit, both GeForce cards take a commanding lead over the Rage Fury MAXX, while the 3D Prophet DDR-DVI maintains a marginal gain over the ASUS card. Under 16-bit, the memory bandwidth is simply not strained enough to relate a large performance gap.





    Copyright © 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. About INT Media Group | Press Releases | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities