Card	640x480	800x600	1024x768	1280x1024	1600x1200
OCZ Titan 3 @ 215/515	194.6	190.6	178.2	130.2	89.8
Leadtek GF3 @ 215/515	194	190.1	177.9	130.2	89.8
Leadtek GF3 @ 200/460	193.8	188	170.5	118.3	80.4
Leadtek 32 MB GTS	181.5	146.2	93.6	59.5	39.7

Card	640x480	800x600	1024x768	1280x1024	1600x1200
OCZ Titan 3 @ 215/515	193.8	189.3	171.8	122.3	85.1
Leadtek GF3 @ 215/515	193.2	189.1	171.6	121.4	85.1
Leadtek GF3 @ 200/460	192.4	186.3	161.9	110.5	76.4
Leadtek 32 MB GTS	180.6	141.6	89.3	56.8	37.3

Once again, we see the same pattern here, with the OCZ Titan 3 easily beating a reference GF3 at its default 200/460 setting, but more or less providing comparable performance once you overclock that GF3 to the OCZ Titan 3's 215/515 speed. And as for the GTS... well that's just there to get beaten up, I guess.

Card	640x480	1024x768	1600x1200
OCZ Titan 3 @ 215/515	48.2	39.3	23.3
Leadtek GF3 @ 215/515	48.1	39.1	23.3
Leadtek GF3 @ 200/460	47.8	36.9	21.9

Card	640x480	1024x768	1600x1200
OCZ Titan 3 @ 215/515	48.1	37.9	21.6
Leadtek GF3 @ 215/515	48	37.7	21.5
Leadtek GF3 @ 200/460	47.8	35.5	19.7

Aquamark has become a standard means of benchmarking GeForce3 cards, so the GTS falls out of the pack at this point in the benchmarking. Continuing with the now-set trend, this test shows the two GF3 cards getting similar scores at the same clock