Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme :


Latest News


- OCZ Unveils the CrossOver USB 2.0 Flash Drive
- NewerTech Unleashes the First "Quad Interface" SATA Docking Station
- Lian-Li Launches New Card Reader and HDD Bracket Cooling Kits
- Crucial Triples Up With New Three-Channel DDR3 Kits
- OCZ Adds Three New Fatal1ty Power Supplies
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- July High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - Intel Core i7-965 XE & Core i7-920 Review

  • Motherboards

    - Intel DX48BT2 (X48) Motherboard Review
    - AMD 790GX Chipset Review
    - Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DS5 Motherboard Review
    - AMD 780G Chipset Review

  • Video Cards






  • Predictably enough, the card we got overclocked well. It would be pretty sad to have this cool looking card that has a Blue Orb HSF and copper heatsinks just to run it at spec, after all. The card already comes clocked higher than the reference speed of 200/460, shipping at 215/515. But given the fact that it uses 3.8ns DDR RAM, it was clear that the RAM had some room to go up; and the cooling on this card made it apparent that we should be able to get it even higher than we could otherwise.

    While it should be noted, at this point, that your mileage may vary and that, particularly with a smaller company, the card you get and the one we got sent for evaluation purposes may differ slightly, I was able to run the card without any erratic behavior at 240/555. At higher clock and memory speeds, some applications began displaying some irregularities that made it impossible to call stable. But at a 240MHz clock speed and 555MHz memory speed, I had no problems running Quake 3, 3DMark 2001, Aquamark, Vulpine GLMark, and Max Payne. And performance, of course, went up with the speeds, particularly on higher-resolution tests.

    Card1024x7681280x10241600x1200
    OCZ Titan 3 @ 240/555178.4133.694
    OCZ Titan 3 @ 215/515171.8121.385.1

    That Leadtek GF3 card I used in the earlier benchmarks has now been taken out of the running because while getting it to the OCZ Titan 3's default of 215/515 was no problem, getting it up to the 240/555 we overclocked the Titan 3 to proved impossible.

    As you can see from these Quake 3 Arena scores, moving from 215/515 resulted in a 10% speed increase at 1600x1200, both at 16-bit and 32-bit. Low-resolution scores (640x480 and 800x600) did dip slightly, but I doubt anyone needs a game to run faster than 192 frames per second at 640x480.

    CardAquamarkGLMark
    OCZ Titan 3 @ 240/55023.630.6
    OCZ Titan 3 @ 215/51521.630.1

    CardScore
    OCZ Titan 3 @ 240/5506400
    OCZ Titan 3 @ 215/5156043

    And as you'll see here, both Aquamark and Vulpine GLMark showed only negligible speed increases from overclocking to 240/555; but the 3DMark 2001 score we got is the highest we've seen from a GeForce 3, with its 6400 score we got 6% faster than at the default clock and memory speeds of the OCZ Titan 3 and 12% faster than what you could expect from a reference GF3 at its default 200/460 speed.





    Copyright © 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. About INT Media Group | Press Releases | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities