Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : Video cards January 18, 2010





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- Intel's New Atoms Borrow from Nehalem
- Intel Unveils First Integrated CPU Lineup
- Seagate Launches Enterprise Solid-State Drive
- Micron Delivers SATA 6Gb/s Solid-State Drive
- Chip Market Recovering From '08 Collapse
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte X48T-DQ6 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers



  •   


    VisionTek Xtasy GeForce4 MX 440 Review
    By Vince Freeman :  April 19, 2002

    3DMark 2001 Pro 32-bit Performance

    MadOnion's 3DMark 2001 is a popular 3D benchmark tool, and one that many gamers use to compare performance results. All benchmark testing was performed in 32-bit mode, and used pure hardware T&L/DirectX support. Please note that not all of the tested cards have the hardware necessary to complete all 3DMark 2001 Pro tests, which leads to a lower score for both the GeForce4 MX 440 and GeForce2 Ti. .

    Without the necessary DirectX 8 hardware, the Xtasy GeForce4 MX 440 simply can't compete on equal ground in 3DMark 2001 Pro. This demonstrates the potential performance loss when the GeForce4 MX is faced with a fully-featured DirectX 8 game. Even so, the Xtasy GeForce4 MX 440 beats out the GeForce2 Ti and actually posts some pretty impressive scores, when you take into consideration the number of actual tests it could complete.

    FSAA Performance

    As we saw in our benchmark testing, the Xtasy GeForce4 MX 440 can handle standard 3D games quite well, but falters when faced with a DirectX 8 application like 3DMark 2001. For our FSAA performance comparison, we're attempting to show how the GeForce4 MX 440's Accuview Anti Aliasing performs in the vast majority of current 3D games. This is an important distinction, because it can give us a true picture of basic AA performance, and without predetermining the results by introducing pixel and vertex shaders into the equation.

    To demonstrate the potential HRAA performance of the Xtasy GeForce4 MX 440, we selected Quake 3 and then performed benchmarking at all AA settings using the Normal detail setting. To provide comparison scores against competitive, entry-level products, we also tested the GeForce2 Ti and GeForce3 Ti 200

    The anti aliasing results are pretty standard, as we have the GeForce3 Ti 200 winning the majority of test settings. One surprise occurs at 4X FSAA, where the GeForce2 Ti inexplicably beats out the GeForce4 MX 440. Another happens with Quincunx, as the GeForce2 Ti 200 falls to the GeForce4 MX. No matter how you slice the numbers, the overall anti aliasing performance of the Xtasy GeForce4 MX 440 outstrips its relative performance in basic 3D benchmarks. It is quite obvious that in non-DirectX 8 games, Accuview Anti Aliasing helps the GeForce4 MX 440 increase its relative FSAA performance compared to the GeForce2 and GeForce3 cards.



    Page 1 Introduction
    Page 2 The GeForce4 MX 440
    Page 3 GeForce4 MX Features
    Page 4 The VisionTek Xtasy GeForce4 MX 440 Card
    Page 5 VisionTek Xtasy GeForce4 MX 440 Specifications
    Page 6 Performance and Test System
    Page 7 Quake 3:Arena Performance
    Page 8 Serious Sam & Return to Castle Wolfenstein Performance
  • Page 9 3DMark 2001 and Quake 3 FSAA Performance
    Page 10 VisionTek Xtasy GeForce4 MX 440 Overclocking
    Page 11 Benchmark, 2D Quality and nView Analysis
    Page 12 Value and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2010 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers