Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : Video cards March 20, 2010





Be a Marketplace Partner








 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- SanDisk's SSD As Rapid As It Is Reliable
- OCZ Launches Limited-Edition SSD
- AMD Offers Low-Profile DirectX 11 Graphics Card
- Microsoft Gaming Keyboard Has Awesome Anti-Ghosting
- Matrox Lets Multi-Monitor Fans Double Up
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs


  • Motherboards


  • Video Cards


    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner














    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers



  •   


    MSI G4Ti4600-VTD (GeForce4 Ti 4600) Review
    By Vince Freeman :  June 20, 2002

    Comanche 4 Benchmark Performance

    The Comanche 4 benchmark from Novalogic gives us an opportunity to use an actual flight sim for 3D video testing. This is a different game engine that we've ever used before, so don't be put off by the relatively low framerates. Just like the high fps of Quake 3, a card's relative position is the most important factor. These tests were run in both 16 and 32-bit modes, with sound disabled.

    The Comanche 4 benchmark scores show a very nice separation between the cards, though there is some bunching due to the low framerates. The GeForce3 Ti 500 does fall back quite a bit, especially at higher resolutions, and as expected the MSI G4Ti4600-VTD takes the crown.

    In moving to the 32-bit settings, the most telling scores are at 1600x1200. Here, only the MSI G4Ti4600-VTD and GeForce4 Ti 4400 keep up the pace, while the 64-MB boards fall back quite noticeably.

    Jedi Knight II Performance

    Jedi Knight is the newest Quake 3-based game and some would say it is the among the most resource hungry. In fact, it's been nicknamed the "best reason to own a GeForce4 Ti" and gives us with another excellent way of measuring high-end 3D gaming performance. In this particular instance, the video cards have been tested using standard Normal and High Quality detail settings.

    The Jedi Knight II Normal detail scores maintain previous trends at lower resolutions, with more separation happening as these are raised. Once again, 1600x1200 testing show off the power of each card best, with the MSI G4Ti4600-VTD putting in a greater-than 100 fps score.

    The High Quality scores are also consistent and right at the levels we expected. As with Normal testing, the most startling results are at 1600x1200 and it's here where we see the real difference between the 128-MB GeForce4 Ti 4600/440 and the 64-MB GeForce3 Ti.



    Page 1 Introduction
    Page 2 The MSI G4Ti4600-VTD Card and Bundle
    Page 3 MSI G4Ti4600-VTD Specifications
    Page 4 Performance and Test System
    Page 5 Quake 3 and 3DMark 2001SE Performance
    Page 6 Serious Sam & Return to Castle Wolfenstein Performance
  • Page 7 Comanche 4 and Jedi Knight II Performance
    Page 8 MSI G4Ti4600-VTD Overclocking and Analysis
    Page 9 Value and Conclusion


    Copyright(c) 2010 QuinStreet Inc. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers