Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Motherboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices



Sharky Extreme : Video cards October 4, 2007


 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links



 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking



Latest News


- Razer and Belkin Rev Up New Gaming Controls
- Samsung's 19-Inch Flat Panel Plugs Into USB Port
- Kingston Pushes DDR-3 Speeds Up, Latencies Down
- NEC's 24-Inch LCD Features Preset Modes for Different Apps
- Dell's Ultimate Gaming Notebook Includes PhysX Engine
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- September High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- August Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- July Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - Intel Xeon X5365 V8 Performance Review
    - Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Processor Review

  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards

    - Gigabyte GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB Review
    - Albatron GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB Review

    internet.commerce
    Be a Commerce Partner
    Baby Photo Contest
    Dental Insurance
    Contemporary Art
    Managed Hosting
    Home Mortgage Loans
    Economy Server Racks
    GPS
    Televisions
    Cell Phone Plans
    Holiday Gift Ideas
    Laptop Computers
    Marketing Products
    Laptop Batteries
    Online Meetings

    internet.com
    IT
    Developer
    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology
    International

    Search internet.com
    Advertise
    Corporate Info
    Newsletters
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


  •   


    ASUS EAX1650XT 256MB Review
    By Vince Freeman :  January 11, 2007

    Benchmark Analysis

    The overall performance of the ASUS EAX1650XT 256MB, especially as it relates to the GeForce 7600 GT, is highly dependant on the game or application benchmark used. Like the other Radeon X1000 series cards before it, the X1650 XT is tuned towards high-end SM3.0 performance, at the expense of greater pixel-pushing power. The GeForce 7600 GT 256MB is more of a hybrid design, providing mainstream performance across the spectrum of 3D games. But this also means that with higher-end SM3.0 games like F.E.A.R. and Company of Heroes, the ASUS EAX1650XT 256MB will have a performance advantage, while still falling short on older or less-robust games. It's been this way since the ATI introduced the Radeon X1000 graphics line, and the ASUS implementation of the Radeon X1650 XT has the same set of pros and cons.

    Value

    The retail price of a Radeon X1650 XT 256MB card currently sits in the $145-$155 range, and surprisingly, the ASUS EAX1650XT 256MB is right in the thick of things, selling for approximately $150. We say this because the ASUS name usually entails a slight price premium, and it's amazing you can get the ASUS quality, performance, retail package, and 3-year warranty for the same price as the other brands. Although there are lower-cost OEM models, this price tag compares quite well to name brand GeForce 7600 GT 256MB cards, which also sit in the same basic price range.

    In fact, the ASUS EN7600GT 256MB also sells for $150, while other mainstream and high-end cards include the Radeon X1600 Pro 256MB ($90-$100), GeForce 6600 GT 128MB ($90-$100), Radeon X1600 XT 256MB ($115-$125), Radeon X1650 Pro 256MB ($125-$140) GeForce 7600 GT 256MB ($135-$155), and GeForce 6800 GS ($150-$165) cards. ASUS also offers a CrossFire version of the EAX1650XT 256MB which sells for approximately $10 more than the standard version.

    * Please note that online prices reflect Retail models when possible, only OEM where noted. Prices are taken at the time of review, and are not intended to reflect long-term trends.

    Conclusion

    The ASUS EAX1650XT 256MB may not be a GeForce 7600 GT-killer, but it does provide very competitive features and performance, and at a very similar price point. The addition of the RV560 core also makes it a significant improvement compared to the Radeon X1600 XT and X1650 Pro. But like other Radeon X1000 graphics cards, the newer and more SM3.0-demanding the game, the better the relative performance will be against the GeForce 7600 GT, and vice versa. ASUS has done a very good job with their take on the Radeon X1650 XT, and perhaps best of all, now offers ATI fans a compelling alternative in the mainstream market.

    Pros:

    • Above-class SM3.0 Performance
    • More Powerful RV560 Core
    • Supports CrossFire

    Cons:

    • Requires External Power
    • Lower Relative Performance in Older Games

    Ratings:



    Page 1 The ASUS EAX1650XT 256MB Card
    Page 2 Test Setup and Benchmark Software
    Page 3 Unreal Tournament 2004 and Half-Life 2 Performance
    Page 4 DOOM 3 and Quake 4 Performance
    Page 5 Farcry and Prey Performance
    Page 6 Chronicles of Riddick and Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory Performance
    Page 7 F.E.A.R. and Company of Heroes Performance
    Page 8 3DMark06 Advanced Standard & Feature Performance
  • Page 9 Benchmark Analysis, Value, and Conclusion

    Copyright(c) 2007 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy